Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24846791›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2014

Laparoscopic implementation of the Altemeier procedure for recurrent rectal prolapse. Technical note.

Gaetano La Greca, Maria Sofia, Stefano Primo, Valentina Randazzo, Rosario Lombardo, Domenico Russello

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Recurrent Rectal Prolapse.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gaetano La GrecaDepartment of Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies, University of Catania - General Surgery and Minivasive HPB Surgery, Cannizzaro Hospital Via Messina 829, 95100 Catania, Italy. Electronic address: glagreca@unict.it.
Maria SofiaDepartment of Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies, University of Catania - General Surgery and Minivasive HPB Surgery, Cannizzaro Hospital Via Messina 829, 95100 Catania, Italy.
Stefano PrimoDepartment of Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies, University of Catania - General Surgery and Minivasive HPB Surgery, Cannizzaro Hospital Via Messina 829, 95100 Catania, Italy.
Valentina RandazzoDepartment of Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies, University of Catania - General Surgery and Minivasive HPB Surgery, Cannizzaro Hospital Via Messina 829, 95100 Catania, Italy.
Rosario LombardoDepartment of Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies, University of Catania - General Surgery and Minivasive HPB Surgery, Cannizzaro Hospital Via Messina 829, 95100 Catania, Italy.
Domenico RusselloDepartment of Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies, University of Catania - General Surgery and Minivasive HPB Surgery, Cannizzaro Hospital Via Messina 829, 95100 Catania, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMany surgical options exist to treat rectal prolapse with different indications, feasibility and results in urgent and complicated cases. These include perineal or abdominal approaches including rectopexy with or without resection. Perineal approaches have reduced surgical invasivity and hospital stay if compared to transabdominal approaches by open surgery or laparoscopy. Up to now there was still a clear dividing line for surgical treatment between the perineal approach, used more for complicated emergency case while the transabdominal open, or laparoscopic approach more common in elective surgery, but more complex to perform. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 37 year old female patient affected by psychiatric disease presented with an unreducible second recurrence of a complicated rectal prolapse. The patient was treated with a third Altemeier procedure but now performed under laparoscopic control. The patient recovered promptly without any complication or recurrence up to the 24 months follow-up. DISCUSSION: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report describing the combined laparoscopic-perineal approach for the treatment of a complicated recurrence of rectal prolapse. The technical feasibility, the rapidity, the optimal outcome and the rationale behind this option all suggest that this laparoscopic assistance certainly allows an implementation of the effectiveness, safety and results of an established effective perineal approach.

conclusionThis combined approach has the advantage of maintaining the simplicity and rapidity of conventional perineal surgery, adding the advantages of abdominal control and avoiding the risks, the invasivity, and the longer duration of more complex laparoscopic procedures.

Indexed as

AltemeierComplicationLaparoscopyRectal prolapseRecurrenceSurgical technique

Identifiers

PMID24846791
PMCPMC4064421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.