Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24846614›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience2014

Accuracy of regenerating motor neurons: influence of diffusion in denervated nerve.

R D Madison, G A Robinson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

R D MadisonDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, United States; Biological Laboratory Research and Development Service of the Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC 27705, United States. Electronic address: roger.madison@dm.duke.edu.
G A RobinsonDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, United States.
Duke Medical Center · USDuke University Hospital · US

Funding

Low-Voltage Nerve Electrophoresis In Vivo: Role in Peripheral Nerve RegenerationR01NS069597 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MADISON, ROGER D. · 2010 to 2013
$878k
NINDS NIH HHS NS069597NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS069597
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following injury to a peripheral nerve the denervated distal nerve segment undergoes remarkable changes including loss of the blood-nerve barrier, Schwann cell proliferation, macrophage invasion, and the production of many cytokines and neurotrophic factors. The aggregate consequence of such changes is that the denervated nerve becomes a permissive and even preferred target for regenerating axons from the proximal nerve segment. The possible role that an original end-organ target (e.g. muscle) may play in this phenomenon during the regeneration period is largely unexplored. We used the rat femoral nerve as an in vivo model to begin to address this question. We also examined the effects of disrupting communication with muscle in terms of accuracy of regenerating motor neurons as judged by their ability to correctly project to their original terminal nerve branch. Our results demonstrate that the accuracy of regenerating motor neurons is dependent upon the denervated nerve segment remaining in uninterrupted continuity with muscle. We hypothesized that this influence of muscle on the denervated nerve might be via diffusion-driven movement of biomolecules or the active axonal transport that continues in severed axons for several days in the rat, so we devised experiments to separate these two possibilities. Our data show that disrupting ongoing diffusion-driven movement in a denervated nerve significantly reduces the accuracy of regenerating motor neurons.

Indexed as

AnimalsAxonal TransportAxonsCell CountConstriction, PathologicDisease Models, AnimalFacilitated DiffusionFemaleFemoral NerveMaleMotor NeuronsMuscle, SkeletalNerve CrushNerve RegenerationNeuroanatomical Tract-Tracing TechniquesPeroneal Nerveband of Bungnerdenervated nervediffusionPNS regeneration

Identifiers

PMID24846614
PMCPMC4096846
OpenAlexW2094470845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.