ArticleMagnetic resonance imaging2014
Highly accelerated aortic 4D flow MR imaging with variable-density random undersampling.
Article in Magnetic resonance imaging, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimizing encoding strategies for 4D Flow MRI of mean and turbulent flow.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- FlowRAU-Net: Accelerated 4D Flow MRI of Aortic Valvular Flows With a Deep 2D Residual Attention Network.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2022Article
- Three-dimensional printing for cardiovascular diseases: from anatomical modeling to dynamic functionality.Biomedical engineering online · 2020Review
- 4D flow imaging of the thoracic aorta: is there an added clinical value?Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2020Review
- Extending Cardiac Functional Assessment with Respiratory-Resolved 3D Cine MRI.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Comparison of two accelerated 4D-flow sequences for aortic flow quantification.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Accelerated whole-heart MR angiography using a variable-density poisson-disc undersampling pattern and compressed sensing reconstruction.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2018Article
- Computational Fluid Dynamics and Additive Manufacturing to Diagnose and Treat Cardiovascular Disease.Trends in biotechnology · 2017Review
- Comprehensive Multi-Dimensional MRI for the Simultaneous Assessment of Cardiopulmonary Anatomy and Physiology.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Retrospectively gated intracardiac 4D flow MRI using spiral trajectories.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2016Article
- 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance consensus statement.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2015Review
- Four dimensional magnetic resonance velocimetry for complex flow in the jugular vein.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo investigate an effective time-resolved variable-density random undersampling scheme combined with an efficient parallel image reconstruction method for highly accelerated aortic 4D flow MR imaging with high reconstruction accuracy. MATERIALS AND
methodsVariable-density Poisson-disk sampling (vPDS) was applied in both the phase-slice encoding plane and the temporal domain to accelerate the time-resolved 3D Cartesian acquisition of flow imaging. In order to generate an improved initial solution for the iterative self-consistent parallel imaging method (SPIRiT), a sample-selective view sharing reconstruction for time-resolved random undersampling (STIRRUP) was introduced. The performance of different undersampling and image reconstruction schemes were evaluated by retrospectively applying those to fully sampled data sets obtained from three healthy subjects and a flow phantom.
resultsUndersampling pattern based on the combination of time-resolved vPDS, the temporal sharing scheme STIRRUP, and parallel imaging SPIRiT, were able to achieve 6-fold accelerated 4D flow MRI with high accuracy using a small number of coils (N=5). The normalized root mean square error between aorta flow waveforms obtained with the acceleration method and the fully sampled data in three healthy subjects was 0.04±0.02, and the difference in peak-systolic mean velocity was -0.29±2.56cm/s.
conclusionQualitative and quantitative evaluation of our preliminary results demonstrate that time-resolved variable-density random sampling is efficient for highly accelerating 4D flow imaging while maintaining image reconstruction accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.