Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24846307›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

RNABindRPlus: a predictor that combines machine learning and sequence homology-based methods to improve the reliability of predicted RNA-binding residues in proteins.

Rasna R Walia, Li C Xue, Katherine Wilkins, Yasser El-Manzalawy, Drena Dobbs, Vasant Honavar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 125 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Accurate Identification of Protein Binding Sites for All Drug Modalities Using ALLSites.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Rasna R WaliaBioinformatics and Computational Biology Program, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, United States of America; Department of Computer Science, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, United States of America.
Li C XueCollege of Information Sciences and Technology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Katherine WilkinsDepartment of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America; Graduate Field of Computational Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.
Yasser El-ManzalawyDepartment of Systems and Computer Engineering, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.
Drena DobbsBioinformatics and Computational Biology Program, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, United States of America; Department of Genetics, Development, and Cell Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, United States of America.
Vasant HonavarCollege of Information Sciences and Technology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States of America; Bioinformatics and Genomics Graduate Program, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States of America; The Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Iowa State University · USPennsylvania State University · USAl-Azhar University · EGCornell University · US

Funding

Discovery of Protein Seq.Struct.Func.RelationshipsR33GM066387 · NIGMS · IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HONAVAR, VASANT G. · 2005 to 2006
$545k
Protein Sequence Structure Function RelationshipsR21GM066387 · NIGMS · IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HONAVAR, VASANT G. · 2003 to 2004
$291k
NIGMS NIH HHS GM066387NIGMS NIH HHS R21 GM066387NIGMS NIH HHS R33 GM066387
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein-RNA interactions are central to essential cellular processes such as protein synthesis and regulation of gene expression and play roles in human infectious and genetic diseases. Reliable identification of protein-RNA interfaces is critical for understanding the structural bases and functional implications of such interactions and for developing effective approaches to rational drug design. Sequence-based computational methods offer a viable, cost-effective way to identify putative RNA-binding residues in RNA-binding proteins. Here we report two novel approaches: (i) HomPRIP, a sequence homology-based method for predicting RNA-binding sites in proteins; (ii) RNABindRPlus, a new method that combines predictions from HomPRIP with those from an optimized Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier trained on a benchmark dataset of 198 RNA-binding proteins. Although highly reliable, HomPRIP cannot make predictions for the unaligned parts of query proteins and its coverage is limited by the availability of close sequence homologs of the query protein with experimentally determined RNA-binding sites. RNABindRPlus overcomes these limitations. We compared the performance of HomPRIP and RNABindRPlus with that of several state-of-the-art predictors on two test sets, RB44 and RB111. On a subset of proteins for which homologs with experimentally determined interfaces could be reliably identified, HomPRIP outperformed all other methods achieving an MCC of 0.63 on RB44 and 0.83 on RB111. RNABindRPlus was able to predict RNA-binding residues of all proteins in both test sets, achieving an MCC of 0.55 and 0.37, respectively, and outperforming all other methods, including those that make use of structure-derived features of proteins. More importantly, RNABindRPlus outperforms all other methods for any choice of tradeoff between precision and recall. An important advantage of both HomPRIP and RNABindRPlus is that they rely on readily available sequence and sequence-derived features of RNA-binding proteins. A webserver implementation of both methods is freely available at http://einstein.cs.iastate.edu/RNABindRPlus/.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceModels, TheoreticalAnimalsHumansRNA-Binding ProteinsSequence Analysis, ProteinSequence Analysis, RNARNA-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24846307
PMCPMC4028231
OpenAlexW2116498086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.