Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24845994›Full record

ReviewNature materials2014

Materials as stem cell regulators.

William L Murphy, Todd C McDevitt, Adam J Engler

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature materials, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 330 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
330citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

330 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. The interaction between oxidative stress and Schwann cells.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Immunomodulatory Delivery Materials for Tissue Repair.Advanced healthcare materials · 2025
    Review

270 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

William L Murphy1] Departments of Biomedical Engineering and Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53705, USA [2] Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53705, USA.
Todd C McDevitt1] The Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, USA [2] The Parker H. Petit Institute for Bioengineering and Bioscience, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, USA.
Adam J Engler1] Department of Bioengineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, USA [2] Sanford Consortium for Regenerative Medicine, La Jolla, California 92037, USA.

Funding

Biomaterials for local regulation of growth factor signalingR01HL093282 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI MURPHY, WILLIAM L. · 2009 to 2018
$3.3M
"Smart" Materials to Engineer a More Complete Stem Cell NicheDP2OD006460 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI ENGLER, ADAM J · 2009 to 2009
$2.3M
Stem Cell Morphogen Delivery via Engineered BiomaterialsR01AR062006 · NIAMS · J. DAVID GLADSTONE INSTITUTES · PI MCDEVITT, TODD C · 2011 to 2015
$1.9M
Microsphere-mediated differentiation of embryonic stem cellsR01GM088291 · NIGMS · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI MCDEVITT, TODD C · 2009 to 2013
$1.7M
Stem Cells and Dynamic Materials Improve Cardiac Function Post-mycardial InfarctiR21HL106529 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI ENGLER, ADAM J · 2011 to 2012
$426k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL093282NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL093282NHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL106529NHLBI NIH HHS R21HL106529NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR062006NIAMS NIH HHS TR01AR062006NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM088291NIH HHS DP02OD006460NIH HHS DP2 OD006460
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The stem cell/material interface is a complex, dynamic microenvironment in which the cell and the material cooperatively dictate one another's fate: the cell by remodelling its surroundings, and the material through its inherent properties (such as adhesivity, stiffness, nanostructure or degradability). Stem cells in contact with materials are able to sense their properties, integrate cues via signal propagation and ultimately translate parallel signalling information into cell fate decisions. However, discovering the mechanisms by which stem cells respond to inherent material characteristics is challenging because of the highly complex, multicomponent signalling milieu present in the stem cell environment. In this Review, we discuss recent evidence that shows that inherent material properties may be engineered to dictate stem cell fate decisions, and overview a subset of the operative signal transduction mechanisms that have begun to emerge. Further developments in stem cell engineering and mechanotransduction are poised to have substantial implications for stem cell biology and regenerative medicine.

Indexed as

Cellular MicroenvironmentSignal TransductionStem CellsAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsCell EngineeringHumansNanostructuresRegenerative MedicineBiocompatible Materials

Identifiers

PMID24845994
PMCPMC4163547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.