Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24845876›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2015

Is 20/20 vision good enough? Visual acuity differences within the normal range predict contour element detection and integration.

Brian P Keane, Sabine Kastner, Danielle Paterno, Steven M Silverstein

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Impaired Contour Object Perception in Psychosis.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Impaired contour object perception in psychosis.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Is there a relation between visual motor integration and academic achievement in school-aged children with and without ADHD?Child neuropsychology : a journal on normal and abnormal development in childhood and adolescence · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Schizophrenia and the eye.Schizophrenia research. Cognition · 2015
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Brian P KeaneRobert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, USA, brian.keane@gmail.com.
Sabine Kastner
Danielle Paterno
Steven M Silverstein
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USPrinceton University · US

Funding

Functions of the Thalamus in Perception and CognitionR01EY017699 · NEI · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI SABINE KASTNER · 2007 to 2026
$6.4M
Spatial frequency contributions to contour integration deficits in schizophreniaF32MH094102 · NIMH · UNIV OF MED/DENT NJ-R W JOHNSON MED SCH · PI KEANE, BRIAN PATRICK · 2011 to 2014
$163k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY017699NIMH NIH HHS F32 MH094102NIMH NIH HHS F32MH094102
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contour integration (CI) combines appropriately aligned and oriented elements into continuous boundaries. Collinear facilitation (CF) occurs when a low-contrast oriented element becomes more visible when flanked by collinear high-contrast elements. Both processes rely at least partly on long-range horizontal connections in early visual cortex, and thus both have been extensively studied to understand visual cortical functioning in aging, development, and clinical disorders. Here, we ask: Can acuity differences within the normal range predict CI or CF? To consider this question, we measured binocular visual acuity and compared subjects with 20/20 vision to those with better-than-20/20 vision (SharpPerceivers) on two tasks. In the CI task, subjects located an integrated shape embedded in varying amounts of noise; in the CF task, subjects detected a low-contrast element flanked by collinear or orthogonal high-contrast elements. In each case, displays were scaled in size to modulate element visibility and spatial frequency (4-12 cycles/deg). SharpPerceivers could integrate contours under noisier conditions than the 20/20 group (p = .0002), especially for high spatial frequency displays. Moreover, although the two groups exhibited similar collinear facilitation, SharpPerceivers could detect the central target with lower contrast at high spatial frequencies (p <. 05). These results suggest that small acuity differences within the normal range--corresponding to about a one line difference on a vision chart--strongly predict element detection and integration. Furthermore, simply ensuring that subjects have normal or corrected-to-normal vision is not sufficient when comparing groups on contour tasks; visual acuity confounds also need to be ruled out.

Indexed as

Discrimination, PsychologicalField Dependence-IndependenceForm PerceptionOrientationVisual AcuityAdultConcept FormationContrast SensitivityFemaleHumansMalePerceptual MaskingPsychophysicsReaction TimeReference ValuesVision, Binocular

Identifiers

PMID24845876
PMCPMC4240750
OpenAlexW2052040605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.