Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24845859›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2014

Minimally invasive midvastus versus standard parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

San-Zhong Xu, Xiang-Jin Lin, Xiang Tong, Xuan-Wei Wang

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06267482 (Challenging The TKA Standard Of Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06267482 phase4recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Challenging The TKA Standard Of Care: Patient Specific Surgical Targets As Enabled By The Rosa

TypeinterventionalSponsorLondon Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph'sRan2024 to 2025Enrolled90ConditionsKnee OsteoarthritisArmsROSA PSA Parapatellar Approach, ROSA PSA Subvastus Approach
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Patellar non-eversion in primary TKA reduces the complication rate.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2016
    Pooled it
  3. No difference in clinical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty between patellar eversion and non-eversion.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2016
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Minimally invasive total knee replacement: techniques and results.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2018
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

San-Zhong XuDepartment of Orthopaedics, First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province, China.
Xiang-Jin LinDepartment of Orthopaedics, First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province, China.
Xiang TongDepartment of Orthopaedics, First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province, China.
Xuan-Wei WangDepartment of Orthopaedics, First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMinimally invasive midvastus approach (mini-midvastus) has been widely used in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, the clinical effects still remains controversial. This meta-analysis was based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aiming to quantitatively analyze the clinical efficacy of mini-midvastus versus standard parapatellar approach in TKA.

methodsThis meta-analysis was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. A literature search for the eligible RCTs was carried out in the databases of PubMed, the Cochrane library, EMBASE and Web of Science. Two independent reviewers independently completed the study selection, data extraction, and the assessment of methodological quality. Meta-analysis was conducted by the RevMan 5.2 software.

resultsA total of 18 RCTs (937 patients with 1093 TKAs) published from 2007 to 2013 were included. The meta-analysis suggested that the mini-midvastus approach significantly improved knee range of motion (ROM) and decreased visual analog score (VAS) at postoperative 1-2 weeks (p<0.05), and there were no statistical differences in terms of knee society score (KSS) (6 weeks to 1 year), VAS (6 weeks to 6 months), ROM (6 weeks to 6 months), lateral retinacular release, blood loss, straight leg raise, hospital stay and postoperative complications between the mini-midvastus and standard parapatellar approach (p>0.05). However, the operative time was significantly longer when performing the mini-midvastus group than the parapartellar approach (p<0.05).

conclusionThis meta-analysis found that compared with the standard parapatellar approach, the mini-midvastus approach had early advantages in the VAS and ROM, but had the disadvantage in the operative time. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study Level I.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeFemaleHumansMalePubMedRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecovery of FunctionTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID24845859
PMCPMC4028179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.