ArticleJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry2014
Structure-specific ribonucleases for MS-based elucidation of higher-order RNA structure.
Article in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Analysis of RNA and Its Modifications.Annual review of analytical chemistry (Palo Alto, Calif.) · 2024Review
- B-CePs as cross-linking probes for the investigation of RNA higher-order structure.Nucleic acids research · 2021Article
- A Catalytic and Selective Scissoring Molecular Tool for Quadruplex Nucleic Acids.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2018Article
- Bifunctional cross-linking approaches for mass spectrometry-based investigation of nucleic acids and protein-nucleic acid assemblies.Methods (San Diego, Calif.) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Supported by high-throughput sequencing technologies, structure-specific nucleases are experiencing a renaissance as biochemical probes for genome-wide mapping of nucleic acid structure. This report explores the benefits and pitfalls of the application of Mung bean (Mb) and V1 nuclease, which attack specifically single- and double-stranded regions of nucleic acids, as possible structural probes to be employed in combination with MS detection. Both enzymes were found capable of operating in ammonium-based solutions that are preferred for high-resolution analysis by direct infusion electrospray ionization (ESI). Sequence analysis by tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) was performed to confirm mapping assignments and to resolve possible ambiguities arising from the concomitant formation of isobaric products with identical base composition and different sequences. The observed products grouped together into ladder-type series that facilitated their assignment to unique regions of the substrate, but revealed also a certain level of uncertainty in identifying the boundaries between paired and unpaired regions. Various experimental factors that are known to stabilize nucleic acid structure, such as higher ionic strength, presence of Mg(II), etc., increased the accuracy of cleavage information, but did not completely eliminate deviations from expected results. These observations suggest extreme caution in interpreting the results afforded by these types of reagents. Regardless of the analytical platform of choice, the results highlighted the need to repeat probing experiments under the most diverse possible conditions to recognize potential artifacts and to increase the level of confidence in the observed structural information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.