Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24845249›Full record

ReviewBiopreservation and biobanking2013

Development and progress of Ireland's biobank network: Ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI), standardized documentation, sample and data release, and international perspective.

Blanaid Mee, Eoin Gaffney, Sharon A Glynn, Simona Donatello, Paul Carroll, Elizabeth Connolly, Sarah Mc Garrigle, Terry Boyle, Delia Flannery, Francis J Sullivan and 12 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biopreservation and biobanking, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Ethical implications of using biobanks and population databases for genetic suicide research.American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics · 2019
    Review
  7. Assessing Researcher Needs for a Virtual Biobank.Biopreservation and biobanking · 2017
    Article
  8. Returning Results: Let's Be Honest!Genetic testing and molecular biomarkers · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Blanaid Mee1 St. James's Hospital , Dublin, Ireland .
Eoin Gaffney
Sharon A Glynn
Simona Donatello
Paul Carroll
Elizabeth Connolly
Sarah Mc Garrigle
Terry Boyle
Delia Flannery
Francis J Sullivan
Paul McCormick
Mairead Griffin
Cian Muldoon
Joanna Fay
Tony O'Grady
Elaine Kay
Joe Eustace
Louise Burke
Asim A Sheikh
Stephen Finn
Richard Flavin
Francis J Giles

Funding

Inhibition of Autophagy: A Novel Therapeutic Strategy for Advanced Solid TumorsR21CA139476 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI MAHALINGAM, DEVALINGAM · 2009 to 2010
$655k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA139476-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biobank Ireland Trust (BIT) was established in 2004 to promote and develop an Irish biobank network to benefit patients, researchers, industry, and the economy. The network commenced in 2008 with two hospital biobanks and currently consists of biobanks in the four main cancer hospitals in Ireland. The St. James's Hospital (SJH) Biobank coordinates the network. Procedures, based on ISBER and NCI guidelines, are standardized across the network. Policies and documents-Patient Consent Policy, Patient Information Sheet, Biobank Consent Form, Sample and Data Access Policy (SAP), and Sample Application Form have been agreed upon (after robust discussion) for use in each hospital. An optimum sequence for document preparation and submission for review is outlined. Once consensus is reached among the participating biobanks, the SJH biobank liaises with the Research and Ethics Committees, the Office of the Data Protection Commissioner, The National Cancer Registry (NCR), patient advocate groups, researchers, and other stakeholders. The NCR provides de-identified data from its database for researchers via unique biobank codes. ELSI issues discussed include the introduction of prospective consent across the network and the return of significant research results to patients. Only 4 of 363 patients opted to be re-contacted and re-consented on each occasion that their samples are included in a new project. It was decided, after multidisciplinary discussion, that results will not be returned to patients. The SAP is modeled on those of several international networks. Biobank Ireland is affiliated with international biobanking groups-Marble Arch International Working Group, ISBER, and ESBB. The Irish government continues to deliberate on how to fund and implement biobanking nationally. Meanwhile BIT uses every opportunity to promote awareness of the benefits of biobanking in events and in the media.

Indexed as

Biological Specimen BanksBiomedical ResearchDocumentationHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalInternationalityIrelandNeoplasmsRegistries

Identifiers

PMID24845249
PMCPMC4076973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.