Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24845062›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Computed tomography (CT) perfusion as an early predictive marker for treatment response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in gastroesophageal junction cancer and gastric cancer--a prospective study.

Martin Lundsgaard Hansen, Eva Fallentin, Carsten Lauridsen, Ian Law, Birgitte Federspiel, Lene Bæksgaard, Lars Bo Svendsen, Michael Bachmann Nielsen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. An application study of low-dose computed tomography perfusion imaging for evaluation of the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced gastric adenocarcinoma.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2018
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Imaging of Gastric Carcinomatosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Dealing with the gray zones in the management of gastric cancer: The consensus statement of the İstanbul Group.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2019
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Are complex DCE-MRI models supported by clinical data?Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2017
    Article
  17. Evaluation ofEJNMMI research · 2016
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A Systematic Review on the Role of the Perfusion Computed Tomography in Abdominal Cancer.Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Martin Lundsgaard HansenDepartment of Radiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Eva FallentinDepartment of Radiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Carsten LauridsenDepartment of Radiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Bachelor's Degree Programme in Radiography, Department of Technology, Metropolitan University College, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ian LawDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Birgitte FederspielDepartment of Pathology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lene BæksgaardDepartment of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lars Bo SvendsenDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Michael Bachmann NielsenDepartment of Radiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Rigshospitalet · DKUniversity College Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate whether early reductions in CT perfusion parameters predict response to pre-operative chemotherapy prior to surgery for gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) and gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND

methodsTwenty-eight patients with adenocarcinoma of the gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ) and stomach were included. Patients received three series of chemotherapy before surgery, each consisting of a 3-week cycle of intravenous epirubicin, cisplatin or oxaliplatin, concomitant with capecitabine peroral. The patients were evaluated with a CT perfusion scan prior to, after the first series of, and after three series of chemotherapy. The CT perfusion scans were performed using a 320-detector row scanner. Tumour volume and perfusion parameters (arterial flow, blood volume and permeability) were computed on a dedicated workstation with a consensus between two radiologists. Response to chemotherapy was evaluated by two measures. Clinical response was defined as a tumour size reduction of more than 50%. Histological response was evaluated based on residual tumour cells in the surgical specimen using the standardized Mandard Score 1 to 5, in which values of 1 and 2 were classified as responders, and 3 to 5 were classified as nonresponders.

resultsA decrease in tumour permeability after one series of chemotherapy was positively correlated with clinical response after three series of chemotherapy. Significant changes in permeability and tumour volume were apparent after three series of chemotherapy in both clinical and histological responders. A cut-off value of more than 25% reduction in tumour permeability yielded a sensitivity of 69% and a specificity of 58% for predicting clinical response.

conclusionEarly decrease in permeability is correlated with the likelihood of clinical response to pre-operative chemotherapy in GEJ and gastric cancer. As a single diagnostic test, CT Perfusion only has moderate sensitivity and specificity in response assessment of pre-operative chemotherapy making it insufficient for clinical decision purposes.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorNeoadjuvant TherapyAdenocarcinomaAdultAgedEsophagogastric JunctionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesStomach NeoplasmsTomography, X-Ray ComputedBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID24845062
PMCPMC4028233
OpenAlexW2027437766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.