Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24845058›Full record

ArticleNature communications2014

Physiological and genomic features of highly alkaliphilic hydrogen-utilizing Betaproteobacteria from a continental serpentinizing site.

Shino Suzuki, J Gijs Kuenen, Kira Schipper, Suzanne van der Velde, Shun'ichi Ishii, Angela Wu, Dimitry Y Sorokin, Aaron Tenney, XianYing Meng, Penny L Morrill and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. HFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Shino SuzukiJ. Craig Venter Institute, 4120 Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, California 92037, USA.
J Gijs Kuenen1] University of Southern California, 835 W. 37th St. SHS 560, Los Angeles, California 90089, USA [2] Delft University of Technology, Julianalaan 67, Delft, 2628BC, The Netherlands.
Kira Schipper1] J. Craig Venter Institute, 4120 Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, California 92037, USA [2] Delft University of Technology, Julianalaan 67, Delft, 2628BC, The Netherlands.
Suzanne van der Velde1] University of Southern California, 835 W. 37th St. SHS 560, Los Angeles, California 90089, USA [2] Delft University of Technology, Julianalaan 67, Delft, 2628BC, The Netherlands.
Shun'ichi IshiiJ. Craig Venter Institute, 4120 Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, California 92037, USA.
Angela WuJ. Craig Venter Institute, 4120 Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, California 92037, USA.
Dimitry Y Sorokin1] Delft University of Technology, Julianalaan 67, Delft, 2628BC, The Netherlands [2] Winogradsky Institute of Microbiology, RAS, Prospect 60-let Octyabrya 7/2, Moscow 117811, Russia.
Aaron TenneyJ. Craig Venter Institute, 4120 Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, California 92037, USA.
XianYing MengNational Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Higashi 1-1-1, Ibaraki 305-8566, Japan.
Penny L MorrillMemorial University, St John's, Newfoundland, Canada A1B 3X5.
Yoichi KamagataNational Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Higashi 1-1-1, Ibaraki 305-8566, Japan.
Gerard Muyzer1] Delft University of Technology, Julianalaan 67, Delft, 2628BC, The Netherlands [2] University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, Amsterdam, 1098XH, The Netherlands.
Kenneth H Nealson1] J. Craig Venter Institute, 4120 Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, California 92037, USA [2] University of Southern California, 835 W. 37th St. SHS 560, Los Angeles, California 90089, USA.

Funding

European Research Council 322551
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Serpentinization, or the aqueous alteration of ultramafic rocks, results in challenging environments for life in continental sites due to the combination of extremely high pH, low salinity and lack of obvious electron acceptors and carbon sources. Nevertheless, certain Betaproteobacteria have been frequently observed in such environments. Here we describe physiological and genomic features of three related Betaproteobacterial strains isolated from highly alkaline (pH 11.6) serpentinizing springs at The Cedars, California. All three strains are obligate alkaliphiles with an optimum for growth at pH 11 and are capable of autotrophic growth with hydrogen, calcium carbonate and oxygen. The three strains exhibit differences, however, regarding the utilization of organic carbon and electron acceptors. Their global distribution and physiological, genomic and transcriptomic characteristics indicate that the strains are adapted to the alkaline and calcium-rich environments represented by the terrestrial serpentinizing ecosystems. We propose placing these strains in a new genus 'Serpentinomonas'.

Indexed as

Base SequenceBetaproteobacteriaCaliforniaEcosystemGenome, BacterialHydrogenMolecular Sequence DataPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SHydrogenRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID24845058
PMCPMC4050266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.