Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24844886›Full record

ArticleClinical orthopaedics and related research2014

Editorial: When "safe and effective" becomes dangerous.

Seth S Leopold

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Classifications in Brief: The Dorr Classification of Femoral Bone.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. From Bench to Bedside: Stiffness Begone! (in a Needle).Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2018
    Article
  18. Editorial: The Opioid Epidemic and Orthopaedic Surgery-No Pain, Who Gains?Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2017
    Article
  19. Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: CORRClinical orthopaedics and related research · 2016
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Seth S LeopoldClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, Philadelphia, PA, 19103, USA, sleopold@clinorthop.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Patient SafetyResearch DesignEndpoint DeterminationHumansRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSample SizeTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID24844886
PMCPMC4048394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.