Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24844348›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2014

Assessment of predictors of response and long-term survival of patients with neuroendocrine tumour treated with peptide receptor chemoradionuclide therapy (PRCRT).

G Kong, M Thompson, M Collins, A Herschtal, M S Hofman, V Johnston, P Eu, M Michael, Rodney J Hicks

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. High clinical and morphologic response usingEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2017
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. May the Nuclear Medicine be with you! Neuroendocrine tumours and the return of nuclear medicine.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. The Impact of Posttreatment Imaging in Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Molecular imaging phenotyping for selecting and monitoring radioligand therapy of neuroendocrine neoplasms.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Combination Therapies with PRRT.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

G KongCentre for Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, St Andrew's Place, East Melbourne, VIC, 3002, Australia.
M Thompson
M Collins
A Herschtal
M S Hofman
V Johnston
P Eu
M Michael
Rodney J Hicks
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AUUniversity of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo review the response and outcomes of (177)Lu-DOTA-octreotate chemoradionuclide therapy (LuTate PRCRT) in patients with neuroendocrine tumour (NET) expressing high levels of somatostatin receptors with uncontrolled symptoms or disease progression.

methodsA total of 68 patients (39 men; 17 - 76 years of age) who had completed an induction course of at least three cycles of LuTate PRCRT between January 2006 and June 2010 were reviewed. Ten patients were treated for uncontrolled symptoms and 58 had disease progression despite conventional treatment. The majority had four induction LuTate cycles (median treatment duration 5 months and cumulative activity 31 GBq), and 63 patients had concomitant 5-FU radiosensitizing infusional chemotherapy. Factors predicting overall survival were assessed using the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards regression.

resultsOf those treated for uncontrolled symptoms, 70 % received benefit maintained for at least 6 months after treatment. Among patients with progressive disease 68 % showed stabilization or regression on CT, 67 % on molecular imaging and 56 % biochemically up to 12 months after treatment; 32 patients died. Overall survival rates at 2 and 5 year were 72.1 % and 52.1 %, respectively. Median overall survival was not estimable at a median follow-up of 60 months (range 5 - 86 months). Nonpancreatic primary sites, dominant liver metastases, lesion size <5 cm and the use of 5-FU chemotherapy were statistically significantly associated with objective response. A disseminated pattern and a high disease burden (whole-body retention index) were associated with an increased risk of death. Objective biochemical, molecular imaging and CT responses were all associated with longer overall survival.

conclusionA high proportion of patients with progressive NET or uncontrolled symptoms received therapeutic benefit from LuTate with concomitant 5-FU chemotherapy. The achievement of objective biochemical, molecular or CT responses within 12 months was associated with improved overall survival. Patients with a primary pancreatic site and larger lesions (>5 cm) appeared to have lower objective response rates and may need a more aggressive treatment approach.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsChemoradiotherapyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuroendocrine TumorsOctreotideRadiopharmaceuticalsReceptors, SomatostatinSurvival AnalysisTreatment Outcome177Lu-octreotateAntineoplastic AgentsOctreotideRadiopharmaceuticalsReceptors, Somatostatin

Identifiers

PMID24844348
PMCPMC4159597
OpenAlexW2088344186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.