ReviewMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2014
[Acute kidney injury in the perioperative setting].
Review in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Acute kidney injury in patients with myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention using radial versus femoral access.BMC nephrology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPerioperative acute kidney injury (AKI) is common and is associated with adverse clinical outcomes, excess mortality, and an increased risk for chronic renal failure. Recommendations to prevent perioperative AKI include the early identification of patients at risk, the avoidance of nephrotoxic drugs, and early goal-directed haemodynamic stabilization. The major causes for perioperative AKI are severe sepsis and septic shock, hypovolemia, bleeding and cardiac failure. POSSIBLE RENAL REPLACEMENT MODALITIES: The choice of modality, i.e. intermittent or continuous renal replacement (CRRT) therapy, can be made based on local resources. However, surgical patients frequently have impaired haemodynamics, a decreased pulmonary function and require removal of large amounts of fluid. In such cases, CRRT offers improved haemodynamic stability and volume control. Frequently, patients must be transferred to the operating theatre for redo procedures. Here, slow-extended daily dialysis treatments of 8-12 h can deliver a high dialysis dose with good haemodynamic stability at reduced costs. Surgical patients per se have an increased risk of bleeding. Regional citrate anticoagulation is a new and effective mode of anticoagulation which significantly reduces bleeding risk and transfusion requirements.
conclusionData from a recent meta-analysis show that, in surgical patients, mortality is reduced when renal replacement therapy is started early. In certain surgical diseases, i.e. acute occlusive disease of the abdominal aorta (Leriche's syndrome) following surgical reperfusion, patients are at risk of severe metabolic acidosis and life-threatening hyperkalemia. In such cases, intraoperative dialysis using a mobile batch system can help to avoid these complications by delivering an effective dialysis therapy at the time of reperfusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.