Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24843721›Full record

ArticleJournal of diabetes investigation2013

Modification of a simple clinical scoring system as a diagnostic screening tool for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in Japanese patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

Akinobu Nakamura, Masato Yoneda, Yoshio Sumida, Yuichiro Eguchi, Hideki Fujii, Hideyuki Hyogo, Masafumi Ono, Yasuaki Suzuki, Takumi Kawaguchi, Noriaki Aoki and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of diabetes investigation, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Surrogate markers in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis.Medicine and pharmacy reports · 2021
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

Akinobu NakamuraDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism Yokohama City University Yokohama Japan.
Masato YonedaDivision of Gastroenterology Graduate School of Medicine Yokohama City University Yokohama Japan.
Yoshio SumidaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine Kyoto Japan.
Yuichiro EguchiDivision of Hepatology Saga Medical School Saga Japan.
Hideki FujiiDepartment of Hepatology Graduate School of Medicine Osaka City University Osaka Japan.
Hideyuki HyogoDepartment of Medicine and Molecular Science Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences Hiroshima University Hiroshima Japan.
Masafumi OnoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Kochi Medical School Kochi Japan.
Yasuaki SuzukiDivision of Gastroenterology and Hematology/Oncology Department of Medicine Asahikawa Medical College Asahikawa Japan.
Takumi KawaguchiDivision of Gastroenterology Department of Medicine Kurume University School of Medicine Kurume Japan.
Noriaki AokiSchool of Biomedical Informatics University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Houston TX USA.
Takeshi OkanoueHepatology Center Saiseikai Suita Hospital Suita Japan.
Atsushi NakajimaDivision of Gastroenterology Graduate School of Medicine Yokohama City University Yokohama Japan.
Shin MaedaDivision of Gastroenterology Graduate School of Medicine Yokohama City University Yokohama Japan.
Yasuo TerauchiDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism Yokohama City University Yokohama Japan.
Yokohama City University · JPAsahikawa Medical College Hospital · JPHiroshima University · JPKochi Medical School Hospital · JPKurume University · JPKyoto Prefectural University of Medicine · JPOsaka City University · JPSaga Medical School Hospital · JPSaiseikai Suita Hospital · JPThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AIMS/

introductionWe reinvestigated the clinical usefulness of the modified NAFIC scoring system, modified by changing the weightage assigned to the fasting serum insulin level based on the importance of hyperinsulinemia in the pathogenesis of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), in Japanese patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) who had undergone liver biopsy. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe NAFIC score is conventionally calculated as follows: serum ferritin ≥200 ng/mL (female) or ≥300 ng/mL (male), 1 point; serum fasting insulin ≥10 μU/mL, 1 point; and serum type IV collagen 7 s ≥5.0 ng/mL, 2 points. A total of 147 patients with NAFLD who had undergone liver biopsies were included in the estimation group. To validate the modified scoring system, 355 patients from nine hepatology centers in Japan were also enrolled.

resultsIn the estimation group, 74 (50.3%) patients were histologically diagnosed as having NASH, whereas the remaining 73 (49.7%) were diagnosed as not having NASH. As the percentage of NASH patients increased not only among participants with serum insulin levels greater than 10 μU/mL, but also in those with serum levels greater than 15 μU/mL, we advocated use of the modified NAFIC score, as follows: serum fasting insulin 10-15 μU/mL, 1 point and ≥15 μU/mL, 2 points. The modified NAFIC score showed improved sensitivity and negative predictive value for the diagnosis of NASH. This finding was also confirmed in the validation group.

conclusionsThe modified NAFIC scoring system could be a clinically useful diagnostic screening tool for NASH.

Indexed as

InsulinNon‐alcoholic fatty liver disease

Identifiers

PMID24843721
PMCPMC4020262
OpenAlexW1970504116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.