ArticleJournal of diabetes investigation2012
Predictor variables and an equation for estimating HbA1c attainable by initiation of basal supported oral therapy.
Article in Journal of diabetes investigation, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Insulin Glargine Combined with Oral Antidiabetic Drugs for Asians with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Pooled Analysis to Identify Predictors of Dose and Treatment Response.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
unlabelledAims/Introduction: A method of estimating HbA1c attained after initiation of basal supported oral therapy (BOT) has not been reported previously. The aim of the present study was to determine which characteristics of patients could influence the effectiveness of BOT introduction, and to obtain an equation to estimate HbA1c after BOT initiation. MATERIALS AND
methodsSixty consecutive insulin-naive type 2 diabetic patients with poor glycemic control (HbA1c ≥7.5%) started once-daily injections of insulin glargine. Simple correlations were calculated between parameters such as HbA1c at baseline, HbA1c at week 24, reduction rate of HbA1c over 24 weeks (calculated as: [HbA1c level at baseline - HbA1c level at week 24]/HbA1c level at baseline), duration of diabetes, and the number of classes of coadministered oral antidiabetic drugs. Using multiple linear regression models, the independent effects of these parameters on HbA1c at week 24 were evaluated separately.
resultsMultiple linear regression analysis revealed that duration of diabetes (β = 0.561; P < 0.001) and HbA1c at baseline (β = 0.284; P = 0.006) were significant predictors of HbA1c at week 24. The best fitting multiple regression equation was: HbA1c at week 24 = 0.078 × duration of diabetes + 0.218 × HbA1c at baseline + 4.628 (r (2) = 0.437).
conclusionsThe equation based on the multiple linear regression models indicates necessary conditions for type 2 diabetic patients to achieve target HbA1c. The present findings emphasize the principle that early initiation of BOT in type 2 diabetes effectively achieves good glycemic control. (J Diabetes Invest, doi: 10.1111/j.2040-1124.2011.00164.x, 2011).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.