Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24843339›Full record

ArticleSaudi journal of anaesthesia2014

Pain relief after Arthroscopic Knee Surgery: A comparison of intra-articular ropivacaine, fentanyl, and dexmedetomidine: A prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled study.

Mohammed Babrak Manuar, Saikat Majumdar, Anjan Das, Bimal Kumar Hajra, Soumyadip Dutta, Dipankar Mukherjee, Tapobrata Mitra, Ratul Kundu

RetractedOpen access · diamondAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in Saudi journal of anaesthesia, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Retraction.Saudi journal of anaesthesia
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Retraction · 2020-05-30Falsification/Fabrication of Data · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Objections by Third Party · Plagiarism of/in Article ·
  • Retracted
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mohammed Babrak ManuarDepartment of Anaesthesiology, NRS Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Saikat MajumdarDepartment of Anaesthesiology, NRS Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Anjan DasDepartment of College of Medicine and Sagore Dutta Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Bimal Kumar HajraDepartment of Anaesthesiology, NRS Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Soumyadip DuttaDepartment of Orthopedics, R.G. Kar Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Dipankar MukherjeeDepartment of Anaesthesiology, NRS Medical College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Tapobrata MitraDepartment of R.M.O cum CT, B.I.N, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Ratul KunduDepartment of R.M.O cum CT, B.I.N, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata · INCollege of Medicine & Sagore Dutta Hospital · INR. G. Kar Medical College and Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostoperative pain is very common distressing symptom after any surgical procedure. Different drugs in different routes have been used for controlling post-arthroscopic pain. No one proved to be ideal. We have compared the analgesic effect of ropivacaine, fentanyl, and dexmedetomidine when administered through the intra-articular route in arthroscopic knee surgery. MATERIALS AND

methodsFrom March 2008 to July 2010, 99 patients undergoing arthroscopic knee surgery were randomly assigned into three groups (A,B,C) in a prospective double-blinded fashion. Group A received 10 ml of 0.75% ropivacaine, where Group B received 50 μg fentanyl, and Group C received 100 μg of dexmedetomidine through the intra-articular route at the end of procedure. Pain assessed using visual analog scale and diclofenac sodium given as rescue analgesia when VAS >4. Time of first analgesia request and total rescue analgesic used in 24 hours were calculated.

resultsDemographic profiles are quite comparable among the groups. Time for requirement of first postoperative rescue analgesia in Group A was 380.61 ± 22.973 min, in Group B was 326.82 ± 17.131 min and in Group C was 244.09 ± 20.096 minutes. Total rescue analgesia requirement was less in Group A (1.394 ± 0.496) compared to Group B (1.758 ± 0.435) and Group C (2.546 ± 0.546). Group A had higher mean VAS score at 6(th) and 24(th) postoperative hours. No side effects found among the groups.

conclusionTherefore, it suggests that intra-articular ropivacaine gives better postoperative pain relief, with increased time of first analgesic request and decreased need of total postoperative analgesia compared to fentanyl and dexmedetomidine.

Indexed as

Dexmedetomidinefentanylintra-articularrescue analgesiaropivacaine

Identifiers

PMID24843339
PMCPMC4024683
OpenAlexW2017711051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.