Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24843307›Full record

ArticleSaudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society2014

Scanning laser 'en face' retinal imaging of epiretinal membranes.

Lukas Reznicek, Simeon Dabov, Bader Kayat, Raffael Liegl, Anselm Kampik, Michael Ulbig, Marcus Kernt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Preoperative imaging optimized for epiretinal membrane surgery.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Imaging of tangential traction types in lamellar macular holes.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2017
    Article
  10. Glaucoma: the retina and beyond.Acta neuropathologica · 2016
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lukas ReznicekDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
Simeon DabovDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
Bader KayatDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
Raffael LieglDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
Anselm KampikDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
Michael UlbigDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
Marcus KerntDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeComparison of scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (SLO) based 'en face' imaging techniques of patients with epiretinal membranes (ERM) and evaluation of the accuracy of preoperative diagnostic imaging.

methodsA consecutive, prospective series of 53 study eyes of 46 patients with clinically diagnosed and in optical coherence tomography (OCT) confirmed symptomatic ERMs were included in this study. Spectral domain (SD-) OCT volume scans (20° × 20° with 49 horizontal sections, ART 15) including SLO en face and fundus autofluorescence (FAF) images of the macula were obtained with HRA2 (Heidelberg Retina Angiograph-Optical Coherence Tomography, Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany). In addition, wide-field SLO color and FAF images (Optomap 200Tx, Optos PLC, Dunfermline, UK) were performed also covering the macular area. En face images of both devices were graded for each included study eye based on SD-OCT cross sectional scans.

resultsGrading of SD-OCT (HRA2) based SLO en face green-blue enhanced multi-color, green reflectance, blue reflectance and standard multi-color visualization revealed a better detectability of ERM than SD-OCT-based en face infrared or FAF images or wide-field SLO (Optomap) based pseudo-color, red laser separation, green laser separation, or FAF images. Both FAF visualizations, HRA2 and Optomap based, achieved low mean scores. SD-OCT based en face thickness map visualization revealed good visualization but poor demarcation of epiretinal membranes.

conclusionsIn summary, en face regular or enhanced multicolor SLO images acquired with HRA2 allow a better visualization of epiretinal membranes for preoperative evaluation compared to SD-OCT based en face thickness map or pseudo-color images acquired with Optomap while infrared or FAF images are least suitable to depict epiretinal membranes.

Indexed as

En faceEpiretinal membrane (ERM)Fundus autofluorescenceOptical coherence tomography (OCT)Retinal imaging

Identifiers

PMID24843307
PMCPMC4023114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.