Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24843163›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2014

Predation-associated modulation of movement-based signals by a Bahamian lizard.

David S Steinberg, Jonathan B Losos, Thomas W Schoener, David A Spiller, Jason J Kolbe, Manuel Leal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Properties of an attention-grabbing motion signal: a comparison of tail and body movements in a lizard.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Visual motion detection and habitat preference in Anolis lizards.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2016
    Article
  13. Predation reduces visual communication distance in an Anolis lizard.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

David S SteinbergDepartment of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708; dss25@duke.edu twschoener@ucdavis.edu.
Jonathan B LososMuseum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138;
Thomas W SchoenerSection of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616; and dss25@duke.edu twschoener@ucdavis.edu.
David A SpillerSection of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616; and.
Jason J KolbeDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881.
Manuel LealDepartment of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708;

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Signaling individuals must effectively capture and hold the attention of intended conspecific receivers while limiting eavesdropping by potential predators. A possible mechanism for achieving this balance is for individuals to modulate the physical properties of their signals or to alter the proportion of time spent signaling, depending upon local levels of predation pressure. We test the hypothesis that prey can alter their visual signaling behavior to decrease conspicuousness and potentially limit predation risk via modulation of signal properties or display rate. To do so, we conducted a manipulative experiment in nature to evaluate the possible effect of predation pressure on the physical properties of movement-based signals and on the proportion of time spent signaling by using a well-understood predator-prey system in the Bahamas, the semiarboreal lizard Anolis sagrei, and one of its main predators, the curly-tailed lizard Leiocephalus carinatus. We find that on islands onto which the predator was introduced, male anoles reduce the maximum amplitude of head-bob displays but not the proportion of time spent signaling, in comparison with control islands lacking the predator. This reduction of amplitude also decreases signal active space, which might alter the reproductive success of signaling individuals. We suggest that future studies of predator-prey interactions consider the risk effects generated by changes in signals or signaling behavior to fully determine the influence of predation pressure on the dynamics of prey populations.

Indexed as

AnimalsFemaleLizardsMalePredatory Behaviorcommunicationsignal modulation

Identifiers

PMID24843163
PMCPMC4078856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.