Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24843069›Full record

ArticleFASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology2014

Role of donor and host cells in muscle-derived stem cell-mediated bone repair: differentiation vs. paracrine effects.

Xueqin Gao, Arvydas Usas, Jonathan D Proto, Aiping Lu, James H Cummins, Alexander Proctor, Chien-Wen Chen, Johnny Huard

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Stem Cells and Bone Tissue Engineering.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xueqin GaoStem Cell Research Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; and.
Arvydas UsasStem Cell Research Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; and.
Jonathan D ProtoStem Cell Research Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; and.
Aiping LuStem Cell Research Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; and.
James H CumminsStem Cell Research Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; and.
Alexander ProctorActive Life Scientific, Santa Barbara, California, USA.
Chien-Wen ChenStem Cell Research Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; and.
Johnny HuardStem Cell Research Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; and jhuard@pitt.edu.
University of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of California, Santa Barbara · US

Funding

Muscle Based Tissue Engineering to Improve Bone HealingR01DE013420 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI HUARD, JOHNNY · 2001 to 2010
$3.6M
NIDCR NIH HHS 5R01-DE13420-09NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE013420
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Murine muscle-derived stem cells (MDSCs) have been shown capable of regenerating bone in a critical size calvarial defect model when transduced with BMP 2 or 4; however, the contribution of the donor cells and their interactions with the host cells during the bone healing process have not been fully elucidated. To address this question, C57/BL/6J mice were divided into MDSC/BMP4/GFP, MDSC/GFP, and scaffold groups. After transplanting MDSCs into the critical-size calvarial defects created in normal mice, we found that mice transplanted with BMP4GFP-transduced MDSCs healed the bone defect in 4 wk, while the control groups (MDSC-GFP and scaffold) demonstrated no bone healing. The newly formed trabecular bone displayed similar biomechanical properties as the native bone, and the donor cells directly participated in endochondral bone formation via their differentiation into chondrocytes, osteoblasts, and osteocytes via the BMP4-pSMAD5 and COX-2-PGE2 signaling pathways. In contrast to the scaffold group, the MDSC groups attracted more inflammatory cells initially and incurred faster inflammation resolution, enhanced angiogenesis, and suppressed initial immune responses in the host mice. MDSCs were shown to attract macrophages via the secretion of monocyte chemotactic protein 1 and promote endothelial cell proliferation by secreting multiple growth factors. Our findings indicated that BMP4GFP-transduced MDSCs not only regenerated bone by direct differentiation, but also positively influenced the host cells to coordinate and promote bone tissue repair through paracrine effects.

Indexed as

Mesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationAnimalsBone Morphogenetic Protein 4Bone RegenerationCell DifferentiationCell MovementChemokine CCL2ChondrocytesCraniocerebral TraumaCyclooxygenase 2DinoprostoneGenes, ReporterGreen Fluorescent ProteinsInflammationIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMacrophagesBMP4 protein, humanBone Morphogenetic Protein 4Ccl2 protein, mouseChemokine CCL2Cyclooxygenase 2DinoprostoneGreen Fluorescent ProteinsIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsPtgs2 protein, mouseRecombinant Fusion ProteinsSmad5 ProteinSmad5 protein, mouseangiogenesisbone morphogenetic protein 4cyclooxygenase 2inflammationmonocyte chemotactic protein 1

Identifiers

PMID24843069
PMCPMC4101664
OpenAlexW2098540418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.