Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24842828›Full record

SynthesisSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2014

Active workstations to fight sedentary behaviour.

Tine Torbeyns, Stephen Bailey, Inge Bos, Romain Meeusen

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 44 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02607137 nacompletednot on this map

Evaluation of Training Program on Promoting Family Holistic Health

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe University of Hong KongRan2014 to 2017Enrolled100ConditionsPhysical ActivityArmsHealth Education
NCT02645071 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

FAMILY Project: Brief Program in Reducing Sedentary Behavior and Promoting Physical Exercise

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe University of Hong KongRan2015 to 2017Enrolled141ConditionsPhysical ActivityArmsPhysical Activity
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Evidence of Workplace Interventions-A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Pooled it
  4. The Impact of Active Workstations on Workplace Productivity and Performance: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Pooled it
  5. Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Participation in the Global Corporate ChallengeInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  20. The Influence of Posture on Attention.Experimental psychology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tine TorbeynsDepartment of Human Physiology and Sports Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, B-1050, Brussels, Belgium.
Stephen Bailey
Inge Bos
Romain Meeusen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe impact of active workstations has been studied in several settings, and several outcomes have been investigated. However, the effects on health, work performance, quality of life, etc., have never been systematically reviewed.

objectiveTo evaluate the existing literature about active workstations and their possible positive health and work performance effects. DATA SOURCES: We searched the electronic databases PubMed and Web of Science (up until 28 February 2014). The search terms we used were 'active workstation', 'standing workstation', 'standing desk', 'stand up workstation', 'stand up desk', 'walking desk', 'walking workstation', 'treadmill workstation', 'treadmill desk', 'cycling workstation', 'cycling desk' and 'bike desk', in combination with 'health', 'quality of life', 'cognition', 'computer task performance', 'absenteeism', 'productivity', 'academic achievement', 'cognitive decline', and 'independent living'. In addition, we searched the reference lists of relevant published articles. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized controlled trials, non-randomized controlled trials and non-randomized non-controlled trials investigating the introduction of active workstations in humans were included in this systematic review. Only original studies were included, and we did not accept studies combining the introduction of active workstations with other interventions. Outcomes concerning health, energy expenditure, cognition, quality of life and work performance were included.

resultsWe included 32 studies, of which five were longitudinal studies in school-aged children, 10 were longitudinal studies in adults and 17 were non-longitudinal studies in adults. Sixteen studies investigated standing desks, 15 investigated walking desks, and one investigated a cycling workstation. The general findings were decreased sitting time, increased energy expenditure, a positive effect on several health markers, no detrimental effect on work performance, no acute effect on cognitive function and no straightforward findings concerning computer task performance.

conclusionThe implementation of active workstations might contribute to improving people's health and physical activity levels. The effect of the use of these active workstations on cognition and applied work tasks, such as computer task performance, needs further investigation before conclusions can be drawn. Another aspect that needs further investigation is the implementation of the different active workstations in all age groups.

Indexed as

ErgonomicsHealth Status IndicatorsSedentary BehaviorWorkplaceCognitionEfficiencyEnergy MetabolismHumansQuality of LifeTask Performance and Analysis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.