ArticleAnesthesia and analgesia2014
Benzodiazepine site agonists differentially alter acetylcholine release in rat amygdala.
Article in Anesthesia and analgesia, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gut microbiota: a new player in the pathogenesis of perioperative neurocognitive disorder?Ibrain · 2021Review
- Novel pharmacological treatments for generalized anxiety disorder: Pediatric considerations.Depression and anxiety · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAgonist binding at the benzodiazepine site of γ-aminobutric acid type A receptors diminishes anxiety and insomnia by actions in the amygdala. The neurochemical effects of benzodiazepine site agonists remain incompletely understood. Cholinergic neurotransmission modulates amygdala function, and this study tested the hypothesis that benzodiazepine site agonists alter acetylcholine (ACh) release in the amygdala.
methodsMicrodialysis and high-performance liquid chromatography quantified ACh release in the amygdala of Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 33). ACh was measured before and after IV administration (3 mg/kg) of midazolam or eszopiclone, with and without anesthesia. ACh in isoflurane-anesthetized rats during dialysis with Ringer's solution (control) was compared with ACh release during dialysis with Ringer's solution containing (100 μM) midazolam, diazepam, eszopiclone, or zolpidem.
resultsIn unanesthetized rats, ACh in the amygdala was decreased by IV midazolam (-51.1%; P = 0.0029; 95% confidence interval [CI], -73.0% to -29.2%) and eszopiclone (-39.6%; P = 0.0222; 95% CI, -69.8% to -9.3%). In anesthetized rats, ACh in the amygdala was decreased by IV administration of midazolam (-46.2%; P = 0.0041; 95% CI, -67.9% to -24.5%) and eszopiclone (-34.0%; P = 0.0009; 95% CI, -44.7% to -23.3%), and increased by amygdala delivery of diazepam (43.2%; P = 0.0434; 95% CI, 2.1% to 84.3%) and eszopiclone (222.2%; P = 0.0159; 95% CI, 68.5% to 375.8%).
conclusionsACh release in the amygdala was decreased by IV delivery of midazolam and eszopiclone. Dialysis delivery directly into the amygdala caused either increased (eszopiclone and diazepam) or likely no significant change (midazolam and zolpidem) in ACh release. These contrasting effects of delivery route on ACh release support the interpretation that systemically administered midazolam and eszopiclone decrease ACh release in the amygdala by acting on neuronal systems outside the amygdala.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.