Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24841952›Full record

SynthesisNPJ primary care respiratory medicine2014

Computer decision support systems for asthma: a systematic review.

Patricia Matui, Jeremy C Wyatt, Hilary Pinnock, Aziz Sheikh, Susannah McLean

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in NPJ primary care respiratory medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03511482 nawithdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

An Open Feasibility Study to Investigate the Impact of A Digitally Delivered Asthma Service for Patients in Primary Care (IDEAL-001: Integrated Digitally EnhAnced Care for Long-term Conditions-001

TypeinterventionalSponsormy mhealth LtdRan2019 to 2021Enrolled0ConditionsAsthmaArmsmyAsthma Application, Lloyds Pharmacy Online Doctor
NCT04056663 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Health-circuit Evaluation as a Digital Support for the Management of Patients at Risk of Hospitalization

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital Clinic of BarcelonaRan2019 to 2020Enrolled400ConditionsMultiple Chronic Conditions, Chronic DiseaseArmsHealth-Circuit mobile application
NCT04275648 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of Exercise Induced Bronchoconstriction by Field Test Using Lung Function and a Novel Automated Digital Clinical Decision System

TypeinterventionalSponsorKarolinska InstitutetRan2020 to 2021Enrolled60ConditionsExercise Induced Bronchoconstriction, AsthmaArmsAsthmaTuner exercise field test
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Computer-Assisted Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Patient views on asthma diagnosis and how a clinical decision support system could help: A qualitative study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. ERS/EAACI statement on adherence to international adult asthma guidelines.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2021
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Patricia MatuiAllergy and Respiratory Research and eHealth Research Groups, Centre for Population Health Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Jeremy C WyattYorkshire Centre for Health Informatics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Hilary PinnockAllergy and Respiratory Research and eHealth Research Groups, Centre for Population Health Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Aziz SheikhAllergy and Respiratory Research and eHealth Research Groups, Centre for Population Health Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Susannah McLeanAllergy and Respiratory Research and eHealth Research Groups, Centre for Population Health Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Funding

Chief Scientist OfficeMedical Research Council MR/L01629X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncreasing use of electronic health records offers the potential to incorporate computer decision support systems (CDSSs) to prompt evidence-based actions within routine consultations.

aimTo synthesise the evidence for the use of CDSSs by professionals managing people with asthma. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe systematically searched Medline, Embase, Health Technology Assessment, Cochrane and Inspec databases (1990 to April 2012, no language restrictions) for trials, and four online repositories for unpublished studies. We also wrote to authors. Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials of CDSSs supporting professional management of asthma. Studies were appraised (Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool) and findings synthesised narratively.

resultsA total of 5787 articles were screened, and eight trials were found eligible, with six at high risk of bias. Overall, CDSSs for professionals were ineffective. Usage of the systems was generally low: in the only trial at low risk of bias the CDSS was not used at all. When a CDSS was used, compliance with the advice offered was also low. However, if actually used, CDSSs could result in closer guideline adherence (improve investigating, prescribing and issuing of action plans) and could improve some clinical outcomes. The study at moderate risk of bias showed increased prescribing of inhaled steroids.

conclusionsThe current generation of CDSSs is unlikely to result in improvements in outcomes for patients with asthma because they are rarely used and the advice is not followed. Future decision support systems need to align better with professional workflows so that pertinent and timely advice is easily accessible within the consultation.

Indexed as

Decision Support Systems, ClinicalAsthmaClinical Trials as TopicHumansOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CareQuality of LifeTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID24841952
PMCPMC4373260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.