Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24841805›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of surgery2015

Perioperative mortality rate (POMR): a global indicator of access to safe surgery and anaesthesia.

David A Watters, Michael J Hollands, Russell L Gruen, Kiki Maoate, Haydn Perndt, Robert J McDougall, Wayne W Morriss, Viliami Tangi, Kathleen M Casey, Kelly A McQueen

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readConsensus StatementReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 73 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02685540 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Death Rate in Anesthesia: A Retrospective Study of Five Years Period From a Tertiary Hospital

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of JordanRan2016 to 2016Enrolled792ConditionsSudden Death
NCT02732067 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Death Rate in Anesthesia: a Prospective Study of Two Years Period From a Tertiary Hospital

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of JordanRan2016 to 2018Enrolled30ConditionsSudden DeathArmsanesthesia related deaths
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Primary knee arthroplasty in Sweden: A nationwide analysis of all-cause 30-day mortality and impact of age and ASA-class.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026
    Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Big data in anaesthesia: a narrative, nonsystematic review.European journal of anaesthesiology and intensive care · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

David A WattersDeakin University and Barwon Health, Royal Australasian College of Surgeons, 1 Spring Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia, watters.david@gmail.com.
Michael J Hollands
Russell L Gruen
Kiki Maoate
Haydn Perndt
Robert J McDougall
Wayne W Morriss
Viliami Tangi
Kathleen M Casey
Kelly A McQueen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe unmet global burden of surgical disease is substantial. Currently, two billion people do not have access to emergency and essential surgical care. This results in unnecessary deaths from injury, infection, complications of pregnancy, and abdominal emergencies. Inadequately treated surgical disease results in disability, and many children suffer deformity without corrective surgery.

methodsA consensus meeting was held between representatives of Surgical and Anaesthetic Colleges and Societies to obtain agreement about which indicators were the most appropriate and credible. The literature and state of national reporting of perioperative mortality rates was reviewed by the authors.

resultsThere is a need for a credible national and/or regional indicator that is relevant to emergency and essential surgical care. We recommend introducing the perioperative mortality rate (POMR) as an indicator of access to and safety of surgery and anaesthesia. POMR should be measured at two time periods: death on the day of surgery and death before discharge from hospital or within 30 days of the procedure, whichever is sooner. The rate should be expressed as the number of deaths (numerator) over the number of procedures (denominator). The option of before-discharge or 30 days is practical for those low- to middle-income countries where postdischarge follow-up is likely to be incomplete, but it allows those that currently can report 30-day mortality rates to continue to do so. Clinical interpretation of POMR at a hospital or health service level will be facilitated by risk stratification using age, urgency (elective and emergency), procedure/procedure group, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists grade.

conclusionsPOMR should be reported as a health indicator by all countries and regions of the world. POMR reporting is feasible, credible, achieves a consensus of acceptance for reporting at national level. Hospital and Service level POMR requires interpretation using simple measures of risk adjustment such as urgency, age, the condition being treated or the procedure being performed and ASA status.

Indexed as

Quality Indicators, Health CareAnesthesiaHealth Services AccessibilityHospital MortalityHumansPatient DischargePerioperative PeriodRisk AdjustmentSurgical Procedures, OperativeTime Factors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.