Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24841276›Full record

SynthesisSkeletal radiology2014

Comparison of choline-PET/CT, MRI, SPECT, and bone scintigraphy in the diagnosis of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer: a meta-analysis.

Guohua Shen, Houfu Deng, Shuang Hu, Zhiyun Jia

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Skeletal radiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 144 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
144citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
18.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05123300 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

PRISMA-PET - Primary Staging of Prostate Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT to Conventional Imaging

TypeinterventionalSponsorOdense University HospitalRan2021 to 2025Enrolled385ConditionsProstate CancerArms18F-PSMA-1007
NCT05597215 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Two Bed SPECT/CT Versus Planar Bone Scintigraphy in Detection of Osseous Metastases in Patients With Genitourinary Malignancies

TypeobservationalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2022 to 2024Enrolled70ConditionsBone Metastases, Urogenital CancerArmsTc-99m MDP and gamma camera
NCT06071195 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

All-in-One Prostate Cancer Staging with MRI

TypeobservationalSponsorEuropean Institute of OncologyRan2021 to 2026Enrolled400ConditionsProstate CancerArmsProstate Cancer Patients
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

144 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 354 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effect ofFrontiers in medicine · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pelvic lymph-node staging withEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Trial
  10. Comparison ofBMC medical imaging · 2020
    Trial
  11. BaselineClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2019
    Trial
  12. Whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (WB-DW-MRI) vs choline-positron emission tomography-computed tomography (choline-PET/CT) for selecting treatments in recurrent prostate cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2017
    Trial
  13. Review
  14. [Incidental bone marrow findings].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  15. Phase I/IIa clinical trial ofAnnals of nuclear medicine · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

84 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Guohua ShenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, No. 37 Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, People's Republic of China, shengh1990@hotmail.com.
Houfu Deng
Shuang Hu
Zhiyun Jia
Sichuan University · CNWest China Hospital of Sichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Published data on the diagnosis of bone metastases of prostate cancer are conflicting and heterogeneous. We performed a comprehensive meta-analysis to compare the diagnostic performance of choline-PET/CT, MRI, bone SPECT, and bone scintigraphy (BS) in detecting bone metastases in parents with prostate cancer. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratios (DOR) were calculated both on a per-patient basis and on a per-lesion basis. Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves were also drawn to obtain the area under curve (AUC) and Q* value. Sixteen articles consisting of 27 studies were included in the analysis. On a per-patient basis, the pooled sensitivities by using choline PET/CT, MRI, and BS were 0.91 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.83-0.96], 0.97 (95% CI: 0.91-0.99), 0.79 (95% CI: 0.73-0.83), respectively. The pooled specificities for detection of bone metastases using choline PET/CT, MRI, and BS, were 0.99 (95% CI: 0.93-1.00), 0.95 (95% CI: 0.90-0.97), and 0.82 (95% CI: 0.78-0.85), respectively. On a per-lesion basis, the pooled sensitivities of choline PET/CT, bone SPECT, and BS were 0.84 (95% CI: 0.81-0.87), 0.90 (95% CI: 0.86-0.93), 0.59 (95% CI: 0.55-0.63), respectively. The pooled specificities were 0.93 (95% CI: 0.89-0.96) for choline PET/CT, 0.85 (95% CI: 0.80-0.90) for bone SPECT, and 0.75 (95% CI: 0.71-0.79) for BS. This meta-analysis indicated that MRI was better than choline PET/CT and BS on a per-patient basis. On a per-lesion analysis, choline PET/CT with the highest DOR and Q* was better than bone SPECT and BS for detecting bone metastases from prostate cancer.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsCholineHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMultimodal ImagingObserver VariationPositron-Emission TomographyPrevalenceProstatic NeoplasmsRadiopharmaceuticalsReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonTomography, X-Ray ComputedCholineRadiopharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID24841276
OpenAlexW1980053751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.