Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24840623›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2014

Evaluation of oseltamivir prophylaxis regimens for reducing influenza virus infection, transmission and disease severity in a ferret model of household contact.

Ding Yuan Oh, Sue Lowther, James M McCaw, Sheena G Sullivan, Sook-Kwan Leang, Jessica Haining, Rachel Arkinstall, Anne Kelso, Jodie Mcvernon, Ian G Barr and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Reducing Influenza Virus Transmission: The Potential Value of Antiviral Treatment.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Quantitative efficacy paradigms of the influenza clinical drug candidate EIDD-2801 in the ferret model.Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Travellers and influenza: risks and prevention.Journal of travel medicine · 2017
    Review
  18. Complexities in Ferret Influenza Virus Pathogenesis and Transmission Models.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2016
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Ding Yuan OhWHO Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Influenza, North Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Sue LowtherAustralian Animal Health Laboratory, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
James M McCawVaccine and Immunisation Research Group, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Royal Childrens Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Sheena G SullivanWHO Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Influenza, North Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Sook-Kwan LeangWHO Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Influenza, North Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Jessica HainingAustralian Animal Health Laboratory, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Rachel ArkinstallAustralian Animal Health Laboratory, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Anne KelsoWHO Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Influenza, North Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Jodie McvernonVaccine and Immunisation Research Group, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Royal Childrens Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Ian G BarrWHO Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Influenza, North Melbourne, Victoria, Australia School of Applied Sciences and Engineering, Monash University, Churchill, Victoria, Australia.
Deborah MiddletonAustralian Animal Health Laboratory, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Aeron C HurtWHO Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Influenza, North Melbourne, Victoria, Australia School of Applied Sciences and Engineering, Monash University, Churchill, Victoria, Australia aeron.hurt@influenzacentre.org.
Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory · AUAustralian Centre for Disease Preparedness · AUMonash University · AUMurdoch Children's Research Institute · AUUniversity of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe emergence of the pandemic influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus in 2009 saw a significant increase in the therapeutic and prophylactic use of neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs) to mitigate the impact of this highly transmissible virus. Prior to the pandemic, many countries stockpiled NAIs and developed pandemic plans for the use of antiviral drugs, based on either treatment of high-risk individuals and/or prophylaxis of contacts. However, to date there has been a lack of in vivo models to test the efficacy of treatment or prophylaxis with NAIs, for influenza-infected individuals or exposed contacts, in a household setting.

methodsA ferret model of household contact was developed to study the efficacy of different prophylaxis regimens in preventing infection in contact ferrets exposed to influenza A(H1N1)pdm09-infected index ferrets.

resultsAmong the different prophylactic regimens, contact ferrets receiving oseltamivir prophylaxis twice daily showed better outcomes than those receiving oseltamivir once daily. Benefits included a significant delay in the time to secondary infection, lower weight loss and higher activity levels. The treatment of index ferrets at 36 h post-infection did not influence either secondary infection rates or clinical symptoms in exposed contact ferrets. Neither prophylaxis nor treatment prevented infection or reduced the duration of viral shedding, although clinical symptoms did improve in infected animals receiving prophylaxis.

conclusionsDifferent oseltamivir prophylaxis regimens did not prevent infections, but consistently resulted in a reduction in symptoms in infected ferrets. However, oseltamivir prophylaxis failed to reduce viral titres, which warrants further investigation in humans.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntiviral AgentsDisease Models, AnimalDisease Transmission, InfectiousFemaleFerretsHumansInfluenza, HumanMaleOseltamivirPre-Exposure ProphylaxisSeverity of Illness IndexViral LoadVirus SheddingAntiviral AgentsOseltamivirA(H1N1)pdm09antiviralneuraminidase inhibitorspandemic

Identifiers

PMID24840623
PMCPMC4130381
OpenAlexW2147055599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.