Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24840360›Full record

ArticleGenetics2014

Insights into three whole-genome duplications gleaned from the Paramecium caudatum genome sequence.

Casey L McGrath, Jean-Francois Gout, Thomas G Doak, Akira Yanagi, Michael Lynch

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Annual review of genetics · 2023
    Review
  13. Evolutionary bioenergetics of ciliates.The Journal of eukaryotic microbiology · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Casey L McGrathDepartment of Biology, Indiana University.
Jean-Francois GoutDepartment of Biology, Indiana University.
Thomas G DoakDepartment of Biology, Indiana University National Center for Genome Analysis Support at Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405.
Akira YanagiDepartment of Human Education Faculty of Human Studies Ishinomaki Senshu University Ishinomaki 986-8580, Japan.
Michael LynchDepartment of Biology, Indiana University milynch@indiana.edu.
Indiana University · USIshinomaki Senshu University · JP

Funding

TRAINING IN GENETICST32GM007757 · NIGMS · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI KUMAR, JUSTIN P · 1985 to 2014
$8.1M
Intramural NIH HHSNIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007757
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Paramecium has long been a model eukaryote. The sequence of the Paramecium tetraurelia genome reveals a history of three successive whole-genome duplications (WGDs), and the sequences of P. biaurelia and P. sexaurelia suggest that these WGDs are shared by all members of the aurelia species complex. Here, we present the genome sequence of P. caudatum, a species closely related to the P. aurelia species group. P. caudatum shares only the most ancient of the three WGDs with the aurelia complex. We found that P. caudatum maintains twice as many paralogs from this early event as the P. aurelia species, suggesting that post-WGD gene retention is influenced by subsequent WGDs and supporting the importance of selection for dosage in gene retention. The availability of P. caudatum as an outgroup allows an expanded analysis of the aurelia intermediate and recent WGD events. Both the Guanine+Cytosine (GC) content and the expression level of preduplication genes are significant predictors of duplicate retention. We find widespread asymmetrical evolution among aurelia paralogs, which is likely caused by gradual pseudogenization rather than by neofunctionalization. Finally, cases of divergent resolution of intermediate WGD duplicates between aurelia species implicate this process acts as an ongoing reinforcement mechanism of reproductive isolation long after a WGD event.

Indexed as

Gene DuplicationGenome, ProtozoanBase CompositionChromosome MappingEvolution, MolecularModels, GeneticParamecium caudatumPhylogenySequence AlignmentSequence Analysis, DNASequence Analysis, RNAgenome evolutionParameciumpolyploidizationspeciationwhole-genome duplication

Identifiers

PMID24840360
PMCPMC4125410
OpenAlexW2098620174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.