ArticlePsychophysiology2014
The temporal course of the influence of anxiety on fairness considerations.
Article in Psychophysiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed.
- Processing of fair and unfair offers in the ultimatum game under social observation.Scientific reports · 2017Trial
- Differences in other-directed emotion regulation tracks connectivity between amygdala and prefrontal regions during fairness decisions.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Social value orientation modulates fairness decision-making in empathic contexts: evidence from event-related potentials and neural oscillations.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2026Article
- Context Modulates Perceived Fairness in Altruistic Punishment: Neural Signatures from ERPs and EEG Oscillations.Brain topography · 2024Article
- Are Deaf College Students More Sensitive to Unfair Information? Evidence from an ERP Study.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- Article
- Electrophysiological evidence of lexical processing impacted by foreign language reading anxiety.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Threat-induced anxiety and selfishness in resource sharing: Behavioral and neural evidence.Human brain mapping · 2023Article
- Intention affects fairness processing: Evidence from behavior and representational similarity analysis of event-related potential signals.Human brain mapping · 2023Article
- Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on fairness-related decision-making.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2022Article
- Electrophysiological Markers of Fairness and Selfishness Revealed by a Combination of Dictator and Ultimatum Games.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2022Article
- Social value orientation modulates fairness processing during social decision-making: evidence from behavior and brain potentials.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2021Article
- Empathy-based tolerance towards poor norm violators in third-party punishment.Experimental brain research · 2021Article
- The role of trait empathy in the processing of observed actions in a false-belief task.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2020Article
- A review of neuroeconomic gameplay in psychiatric disorders.Molecular psychiatry · 2020Review
- Trait Anxiety Attenuates Response Inhibition: Evidence From an ERP Study Using the Go/NoGo Task.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2020Article
- Raise Concerns Without Fear and Protect Confidentiality: Why the Two Orders?Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry · 2019Article
- Your Performance Is My Concern: A Perspective-Taking Competition Task Affects ERPs to Opponent's Outcomes.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2019Article
- Enhanced Memory for Fair-Related Faces and the Role of Trait Anxiety.Frontiers in psychology · 2019Article
- Hey, what is your choice? Uncertainty and inconsistency enhance subjective anticipation of upcoming information in a social context.Experimental brain research · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigated the potential causes of anxious people's social avoidance. The classic ultimatum game was utilized in concert with electroencephalogram recording. Participants were divided into two groups according to levels of trait anxiety as identified by a self-report scale. The behavioral results indicate that high-anxious participants were more prone to reject human-proposed than computer-proposed unequal offers compared to their low-anxious counterparts. The event-related potential results indicate that the high-anxious group showed a larger feedback-related negativity when receiving unequal monetary offers than equal ones, and a larger P3 when receiving human-proposed offers than computer-proposed ones, but these effects were absent in the low-anxious group. We suggest anxious people's social avoidance results from hypersensitivity to unequal distributions during interpersonal interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.