ArticlePloS one2014
Quantitative liver MRI combining phase contrast imaging, elastography, and DWI: assessment of reproducibility and postprandial effect at 3.0 T.
Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01600105 (Prospective Detection of Liver Fibrosis With MRI Compared to Fibroscan and Blood Tests), which is not on this map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prospective Detection of Liver Fibrosis With MRI Compared to Fibroscan and Blood Tests
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.
- Repeatability of MR Elastography of Liver: A Meta-Analysis.Radiology · 2017Pooled it
- DCE-MRI of the liver: reconstruction of the arterial input function using a low dose pre-bolus contrast injection.PloS one · 2014Trial
- Postprandial Changes in Thoracic Aortic Flow Detected by 4D Flow MRI May Influence Study Results.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026Article
- Article
- Optimized acquisition for simultaneous intravoxel incoherent motion and RMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Reproducibility of intravoxel incoherent motion quantification in the liver across field strengths and gradient hardware.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2024Article
- MR Elastography: Practical Questions, From theAJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2024Review
- Clinical studies of magnetic resonance elastography from 1995 to 2021: Scientometric and visualization analysis based on CiteSpace.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2022Article
- Clinical Applications of 4D Flow MRI in the Portal Venous System.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2022Review
- On the relationship between metabolic capacities andFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Cardiac-induced liver deformation as a measure of liver stiffness using dynamic imaging without magnetization tagging-preclinical proof-of-concept, clinical translation, reproducibility and feasibility in patients with cirrhosis.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2021Article
- Noninvasive diagnosis of portal hypertension using gadoxetate DCE-MRI of the liver and spleen.European radiology · 2021Article
- MR elastography: Principles, guidelines, and terminology.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2021Review
- Noninvasive imaging assessment of portal hypertension.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2020Review
- Splenic TJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2020Article
- Magnetic resonance elastography: beyond liver fibrosis-a case-based pictorial review.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2018Review
- Quantitative Elastography Methods in Liver Disease: Current Evidence and Future Directions.Radiology · 2018Review
- Multiparametric FDG-PET/MRI of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Initial Experience.Contrast media & molecular imaging · 2018Article
- Multiparametric functional magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of hepatic warm ischemia-reperfusion injury in a rabbit model.BMC gastroenterology · 2017Article
- Evaluation of hepatic fibrosis: a review from the society of abdominal radiology disease focus panel.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo quantify short-term reproducibility (in fasting conditions) and postprandial changes after a meal in portal vein (PV) flow parameters measured with phase contrast (PC) imaging, liver diffusion parameters measured with multiple b value diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and liver stiffness (LS) measured with MR elastography (MRE) in healthy volunteers and patients with liver disease at 3.0 T. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this IRB-approved prospective study, 30 subjects (11 healthy volunteers and 19 liver disease patients; 23 males, 7 females; mean age 46.5 y) were enrolled. Imaging included 2D PC imaging, multiple b value DWI and MRE. Subjects were initially scanned twice in fasting state to assess short-term parameter reproducibility, and then scanned 20 min. after a liquid meal. PV flow/velocity, LS, liver true diffusion coefficient (D), pseudodiffusion coefficient (D*), perfusion fraction (PF) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were measured in fasting and postprandial conditions. Short-term reproducibility was assessed in fasting conditions by measuring coefficients of variation (CV) and Bland-Altman limits of agreement. Differences in MR metrics before and after caloric intake and between healthy volunteers and liver disease patients were assessed.
resultsPV flow parameters, D, ADC and LS showed good to excellent short-term reproducibility in fasting state (CV <16%), while PF and D* showed acceptable and poor reproducibility (CV = 20.4% and 51.6%, respectively). PV flow parameters and LS were significantly higher (p<0.04) in postprandial state while liver diffusion parameters showed no significant change (p>0.2). LS was significantly higher in liver disease patients compared to healthy volunteers both in fasting and postprandial conditions (p<0.001). Changes in LS were significantly correlated with changes in PV flow (Spearman rho = 0.48, p = 0.013).
conclusionsCaloric intake had no/minimal/large impact on diffusion/stiffness/portal vein flow, respectively. PC MRI and MRE but not DWI should be performed in controlled fasting state.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.