Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24840140›Full record

ArticleJournal of psychosomatic research2014

Evaluation of objective and perceived mental fatigability in older adults with vascular risk.

Feng Lin, Rachel Roiland, Kathi Heffner, Melissa Johnson, Ding-Geng Din Chen, Mark Mapstone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of psychosomatic research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. A Multi-Dimensional Model of Fatigue in Old Age: Implications for Brain Aging.The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Feng LinSchool of Nursing, University of Rochester, United States; Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester, United States. Electronic address: vankee_lin@urmc.rochester.edu.
Rachel RoilandWilliam S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison, WI, United States.
Kathi HeffnerDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester, United States.
Melissa JohnsonSchool of Nursing, University of Rochester, United States.
Ding-Geng Din ChenSchool of Nursing, University of Rochester, United States; Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester, United States.
Mark MapstoneDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester, United States.
University of Rochester · USWilliam S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital · US

Funding

The University of Rochester Clinical and Translational Science InstituteKL2TR000095 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI BENNETT, NANCY M, KIEBURTZ, KARL D. · 2012 to 2015
$1.7M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000095
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesMental fatigability refers to the failure to sustain participation in tasks requiring mental effort. Older adults with vascular risk are at particular risk for experiencing mental fatigability. The present study (1) tested a new way of measuring objective mental fatigability by examining its association with perceived mental fatigability; and (2) identified associated psychological, physiological, and situational predictors.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted with 49 community-dwelling participants aged 75+ years with vascular risk. A 20-minute fatigability-manipulation task was used to induce mental fatigability and develop objective and perceived mental fatigability measures. Objective fatigability was calculated by the change of reaction time over the course of the task. Perceived fatigability was calculated by the change of fatigue self-reported before and after the task. A set of potential psychological, physiological, and situational predictors were measured.

resultsThere was a significant increase in reaction time and self-reported fatigue to the fatigability manipulation task, indicating occurrence of objective and perceived mental fatigability. Reaction time and self-reported fatigue were moderately, but significantly correlated. Higher levels of executive control and having a history of more frequently engaging in mental activities were associated with lower objective mental fatigability. None of the examined factors were associated with perceived mental fatigability.

conclusionObjective and perceived mental fatigability were sensitive to our fatigability-manipulation task. While these two measures were correlated, they were not associated with the same factors. These findings need to be validated in studies with a more heterogeneous sample and a greater variety of fatigability-manipulation tasks.

Indexed as

Reaction TimeAgedAged, 80 and overCognitive DysfunctionCross-Sectional StudiesFatigueFemaleHumansMaleMental FatiguePerceptionVascular DiseasesExecutive controlHistory of mental activitiesMental fatigabilityReaction time

Identifiers

PMID24840140
PMCPMC4033905
OpenAlexW2045579461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.