GuidelineCanadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology2014
Colonoscopy quality assurance in Ontario: Systematic review and clinical practice guideline.
Guideline in Canadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- Perioperative quality indicators specific to the practice of anesthesia in noncardiac surgery: an umbrella review.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2024Pooled it
- Systematic review of shared decision-making in guidelines about colorectal cancer screening.European journal of cancer care · 2022Pooled it
- Sedation practices for routine gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review of recommendations.BMC gastroenterology · 2021Pooled it
- Comparison of three sedation models for same-day painless bidirectional endoscopy: A multicenter randomized controlled trial.Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2022Trial
- Taking a pragmatic approach to implement colonoscopy quality at a health system level: Ontario's colonoscopy quality strategy.Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Metrics to assess the quality of anesthesia, perioperative care, and acute pain management in Canada: a scoping review.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2025Article
- A standardized set of metrics to assess the quality of anesthesia, perioperative care, and acute pain management in Canada: a multidisciplinary modified Delphi study.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2025Article
- Comparing the impact of foot and hand reflexology on anxiety and physiological indices in colonoscopy candidates: A randomized clinical trial.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2025Article
- Association between Endoscopist Volume and Interval Cancers after Colonoscopy: Results from the National Colorectal Cancer Screening Program in Korea.Cancer research and treatment · 2024Article
- Split doses versus whole dose bowel preparation using polyethylene glycol for colonoscopy: A multicentric prospective Lebanese randomized trial between 2021 and 2023.Health science reports · 2024Article
- A randomized trial evaluating the utility of non-targeted biopsies for colorectal neoplasia detection in adults with inflammatory bowel disease: a pilot study protocol.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2024Article
- Comparison of adenoma detection in different colorectal segments between deep-sedated and unsedated colonoscopy.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Article
- Gold nanoparticles enhance microRNA 31 detection in colon cancer cells after inhibition with chlorogenic acid.Oncology letters · 2021Article
- Perforation and post-polypectomy bleeding complicating colonoscopy in a population-based screening program.Endoscopy international open · 2021Article
- The impact of sedation on quality metrics of colonoscopy: a single-center experience of 48,838 procedures.International journal of colorectal disease · 2020Article
- Correlation between ultrasound consolidated score and simple endoscopic score for determining the activity of Crohn's disease.The British journal of radiology · 2020Article
- Standards of diagnostic colonoscopy for early-stage neoplasia: Recommendations by an Asian private group.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2019Article
- Independent Heath Facility Meets Cancer Care Ontario and Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Guidelines for Endoscopic Procedure Wait Times While Meeting Quality Indicators: A Retrospective Review.Canadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology · 2018Article
- How to Make Feedback More Effective? Qualitative Findings from Pilot Testing of an Audit and Feedback Report for Endoscopists.Canadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colonoscopy is fundamental to the diagnosis and management of digestive diseases and plays a key role in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and diagnosis. Therefore, it is important to ensure that colonoscopy is of high quality. The present guidance document updates the evidence and recommendations in Cancer Care Ontario's 2007 Colonoscopy Standards, and was conducted under the aegis of the Program in Evidence-Based Care. It is intended to support quality improvement for colonoscopies for all indications, including follow-up to a positive fecal occult blood test, screening for individuals who have a family history of CRC and those at average risk, investigation for symptomatic patients, and surveillance of those with a history of adenomatous polyps or CRC. A systematic review was performed to evaluate the existing evidence concerning the following three key aspects of colonoscopy: physician endoscopist training and maintenance of competency; institutional quality assurance parameters; and colonoscopy quality indicators and auditable outcomes. Where appropriate, indicators were designated quality indicators (where there was sufficient evidence to recommend a specific target) and auditable outcomes (insufficient evidence to recommend a specific target, but which should be monitored for quality assurance purposes). The guidance document may be used to support colonoscopy quality assurance programs to improve the quality of colonoscopy regardless of indication. Improvements in colonoscopy quality are anticipated to improve important outcomes in digestive diseases, such as reduction of the incidence of and mortality from CRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.