Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24839415›Full record

ReviewHand (New York, N.Y.)2014

Arm ache.

Hosein Ahmadzadeh Chabok, David Ring

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hand (New York, N.Y.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hosein Ahmadzadeh ChabokSurgery Department, Shamsoshomoos Hospital, Malekoshoara Bahar54, Shariati Square, Mashhad, Khorasan Razavi Iran.
David RingDepartment of Hand Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Yawkey 2100, 55 Fruit St., Boston, MA 02114 USA.
Massachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Both patients and providers hope for better management strategies for nonspecific activity-related upper limb pain (herein referred to as "arm ache"). The next innovation in the care of arm ache may arise from the strong evidence that mood, coping strategies (e.g., catastrophic thinking), and heightened illness concern-all very responsive to treatment with cognitive behavioral therapy-account for a large percentage of the variation in symptom intensity and magnitude of disability. This focus on treatments to reduce symptoms and disability represents a change in culture for patients and providers, both of whom are accustomed to the biomedical framework that anticipates a direct correspondence between illness (the state of being unwell) and disease (pathophysiology). Not all patients are ready for such an approach, but as a first step health providers can prioritize empathy; remain mindful that words, illness concepts, and treatments can reinforce ineffective coping strategies; and encourage curiosity about the human illness experience.

Indexed as

Arm painBiomedical frameworkBiopsychosocial frameworkCognitive therapyCoping strategyRational therapy

Identifiers

PMID24839415
PMCPMC4022964
OpenAlexW4229785559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.