Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24839250›Full record

ArticlePsycho-oncology2015

Intentions for risk-reducing surgery among high-risk women referred for BRCA1/BRCA2 genetic counseling.

Angie Tong, Scott Kelly, Rachel Nusbaum, Kristi Graves, Beth N Peshkin, Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir, Marie Wood, Wendy McKinnon, Judy Garber, Shelley R McCormick and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psycho-oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Attitude towards hereditary cancer risk management among women with cancer in Taiwan.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Angie TongLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center/Georgetown University, Oncology, Washington, DC, USA.
Scott Kelly
Rachel Nusbaum
Kristi Graves
Beth N Peshkin
Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir
Marie Wood
Wendy McKinnon
Judy Garber
Shelley R McCormick
Lina Jandorf
Marc D Schwartz
Georgetown University · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USGeorgetown University Medical Center · USUniversity of Vermont · US

Funding

Tissue Culture Shared ResourceP30CA051008 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI STEPHEN W BYERS · 1990 to 2026
$71.5M
Telephone-Based Genetic Counseling: An Equivalence TrialR01CA108933 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI SCHWARTZ, MARC D · 2004 to 2008
$2.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA051008NCI NIH HHS R01 CA108933
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveGenetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility is now part of routine clinical practice. Although rates of risk-reducing surgery following genetic testing have been increasing, little is known about attitudes toward risk-reducing surgery in women prior to genetic counseling and testing. This study examines correlates of patient intentions to undergo risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) and risk-reducing oophorectomy (RRO).

methodsParticipants were 696 women, ages 21-85, who sought breast cancer gene 1 and 2 (BRCA1/2) genetic counseling and had at least a 10% risk of carrying a mutation. The sample included women who were affected with breast or ovarian cancer and unaffected women with a known familial BRCA1/2 mutation. Participants completed a precounseling telephone questionnaire.

resultsPrior to receiving genetic counseling, 23.3% of participants were considering RRM and 42.5% were considering RRO. Variables that were independently associated with RRM intentions were cancer-specific distress (OR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.03-1.26), perceived risk of breast cancer (OR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.05-1.28), education (OR = 1.76, 95% CI = 1.03-2.99), and age (OR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.95-0.98). Predictors of RRO intentions were perceived risk for ovarian cancer (OR = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.14-1.37), perceived risk of carrying a BRCA1/2 mutation (OR = 1.74, 95% CI = 1.15-2.62), marital status (OR = 1.92, 95% CI = 1.34-2.76), and age (OR = 1.02, 95% CI = 1.00-1.03).

conclusionsBecause precounseling intentions predict subsequent risk-reducing surgery decisions, this study identified patient factors associated with surgical intentions. These factors reinforce the critical role for pretest genetic counseling in communicating accurate risk estimates and management options, and addressing psychosocial concerns, to facilitate informed decision making regarding RRM and RRO.

Indexed as

Genes, BRCA1Genes, BRCA2IntentionAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAttitude to HealthBreast NeoplasmsFemaleGenetic CounselingGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMastectomyMiddle AgedOvarian NeoplasmsOvariectomyBRCA1BRCA2cancergenetic counselingoncologyrisk-reducing mastectomyrisk-reducing oophorectomy

Identifiers

PMID24839250
PMCPMC4234699
OpenAlexW1537221832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.