Trial reportInternational journal of clinical oncology2015
Efficacy and safety of sublingual fentanyl orally disintegrating tablet at doses determined by titration for the treatment of breakthrough pain in Japanese cancer patients: a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase III trial.
Trial report in International journal of clinical oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Compliance with the breakthrough cancer pain European guidelines and impact on patients' quality of life: an observational prospective study.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Current management of cancer pain in Italy: Expert opinion paper.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2022Review
- Rapid acting fentanyl formulations in breakthrough pain in cancer. Drug selection by means of the System of Objectified Judgement Analysis.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBreakthrough cancer pain typically has a rapid onset and relatively short duration. Due to this temporal profile, it may not be adequately relieved by oral opioid analgesics. The sublingual fentanyl orally disintegrating tablet is a formulation by which fentanyl can be rapidly absorbed across the oral mucosa producing rapid-onset analgesia, and which may be effective for breakthrough pain treatment.
methodsA multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind comparative study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the sublingual fentanyl tablet at optimized doses for breakthrough pain treatment in cancer patients treated with strong opioid analgesics at fixed intervals. The optimal dose was determined by open-label dose titration. The efficacy and safety of a 12-week extended treatment were also evaluated.
resultsEleven of 42 subjects who received the sublingual fentanyl tablet experienced adverse drug reactions. Common reactions were somnolence, constipation, nausea, and vomiting. No serious adverse reactions occurred. Sublingual fentanyl tablets at optimal doses and placebo were administered to 37 subjects in a double-blinded manner. A significant analgesic effect of the sublingual fentanyl tablet was present compared to placebo at 30 min after administration. The sublingual fentanyl tablet was also effective and safe during extended treatment, in which changes in basal opioid doses as well as sublingual fentanyl tablet doses were made as needed.
conclusionSublingual fentanyl tablets at doses determined by titration were effective and safe for breakthrough pain treatment in cancer patients treated with strong opioid analgesics at fixed intervals. Extended treatment up to 12 weeks was also effective and safe.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.