Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24838947›Full record

SynthesisTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2014

Association between NQO1 C609T polymorphism and prostate cancer risk.

Zihan Sun, Yuling Cui, Jing Pei, Zhiqiang Fan

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zihan SunDepartment of Laboratory Diagnosis, General Hospital of Jinan Military Region, 25 Shifan Road, Tianqiao District, Jinan, 250031, Shandong, China.
Yuling Cui
Jing Pei
Zhiqiang Fan
Jinan Military General Hospital · CNHenan Provincial People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Published studies on the association between NQO1 C609T polymorphism and prostate cancer risk have yielded conflicting results. Thus, a systemic review and meta-analysis of published studies were performed to assess the possible association. All eligible studies of NQO1 C609T polymorphism and prostate cancer risk were collected from the PubMed and the Cochrane Library. Statistical analyses were performed by Review Manage 5.0 and Stata 11.0. A total of 6 available studies were considered in the present meta-analysis, with 717 cases and 1,794 controls. When all groups were pooled, there was no evidence that NQO1 C609T had significant association with prostate cancer under additive, recessive, dominant, and allelic models. When stratifying for the race, our analysis suggested that NQO1 C609T was associated with prostate cancer risk in Asians when using dominant (TT + CT vs CC: OR = 1.419, 95 % CI = 1.053 - 1.913, P = 0.021) and allelic models (OR = 1.337, 95 % CI = 1.014 - 1.763, P = 0.040) to analyze the data. However, no significant associations were found in Caucasians. This meta-analysis suggested that NQO1 C609T polymorphism most likely contributes to increased susceptibility to prostate cancer in the Asians. Further large-scale and well-designed case-control studies are necessary to validate the risk identified in the present meta-analysis.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseasePolymorphism, GeneticHumansMaleNAD(P)H Dehydrogenase (Quinone)Prostatic NeoplasmsRiskNAD(P)H Dehydrogenase (Quinone)NQO1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID24838947
OpenAlexW2085979077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.