Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24838933›Full record

ArticleFamilial cancer2014

How harmful is genetic testing for familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) in young children; the parents' experience.

Anna A Kattentidt-Mouravieva, M den Heijer, I van Kessel, A Wagner

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Familial cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Cancer Genetic Counseling-Current Practice and Future Challenges.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2020
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anna A Kattentidt-MouravievaDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Office Ee2018, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, akattentidt@gmail.com.
M den Heijer
I van Kessel
A Wagner

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predictive genetic testing for familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is routinely offered to children at-risk from the age of 10 years onwards. Predictive testing for FAP at a younger age is debatable, because of absence of medical benefits. However, circumstances may arise when testing at a younger age (<10 years) is appropriate. Currently, there is a lack of published experience with predictive testing of children at this young age. We evaluated 13 children who were tested for FAP at the age younger than 10 years; 7 mutation-carriers and 6 non-carriers. Parents of these children were re-contacted and open-ended semi-structured interviewed. None of the contacted parents regretted the timing of genetic testing. The major reasons for testing at the young age were (1) testing of all children in the family at the same moment; (2) certainty for the future; and (3) preparing the child for future surveillance. None of the parents observed changes in mental or physical health in their child after testing. Also, young genetic testing did not lead to colon surveillance before it was indicated. Genetic testing for FAP at a young age is experienced as causing no harm by parents. Future studies should evaluate children's own experiences with early genetic testing.

Indexed as

ParentsAdenomatous Polyposis ColiChildChild, PreschoolFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingHumansMale

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.