Trial reportClinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2014
Diastolic function and functional capacity after a single session of continuous positive airway pressure in patients with compensated heart failure.
Trial report in Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01088854 (Acute Effect of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure on Left Ventricular Diastolic Function and Exercise Tolerance in Compensated Heart Failure), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Acute Effect of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure on Left Ventricular Diastolic Function and Exercise Tolerance in Compensated Heart Failure
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of continuous positive pressure ventilation on left ventricular diastolic function E/A ratio in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a meta-analysis.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2023Pooled it
- Positive airway pressure therapy for the treatment of central sleep apnoea associated with heart failure.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe effects of acute continuous positive airway pressure therapy on left ventricular diastolic function and functional capacity in patients with compensated systolic heart failure remain unclear.
methodsThis randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial included 43 patients with heart failure and a left ventricular ejection fraction <0.50 who were in functional classes I-III according to the New York Heart Association criteria. Twenty-three patients were assigned to continuous positive airway pressure therapy (10 cmH2O), while 20 patients received placebo with null pressure for 30 minutes. All patients underwent a 6-minute walk test (6MWT) and Doppler echocardiography before and immediately after intervention. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01088854.
resultsThe groups had similar clinical and echocardiographic baseline variables. Variation in the diastolic function index (e') after intervention was associated with differences in the distance walked in both groups. However, in the continuous positive airway pressure group, this difference was greater (continuous positive airway pressure group: Δ6MWT = 9.44+16.05×Δe', p = 0.002; sham group: Δ6MWT = 7.49+5.38×Δe'; p = 0.015). There was a statistically significant interaction between e' index variation and continuous positive airway pressure for the improvement of functional capacity (p = 0.020).
conclusionsContinuous positive airway pressure does not acurately change the echocardiographic indexes of left ventricle systolic or diastolic function in patients with compensated systolic heart failure. However, 30-minute continuous positive airway pressure therapy appears to have an effect on left ventricular diastolic function by increasing functional capacity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.