Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24838896›Full record

Trial reportClinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2014

Efficacy of Papacarie(®) in reduction of residual bacteria in deciduous teeth: a randomized, controlled clinical trial.

Lara Jansiski Motta, Sandra Kalil Bussadori, Ana Paula Campanelli, André Luis da Silva, Thays Almeida Alfaya, Camila Haddad Leal de Godoy, Maria Fidela de Lima Navarro

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01811420 nacompletednot on this map

Chemomechanical Caries Removal Using a Papain-Based Gel: A Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Nove de JulhoRan2009 to 2011Enrolled20ConditionsDental CariesArmsChemomechanical Caries Removal, Conventional method
NCT04619264 phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Impact of Minimally Invasive Restorative Techniques on Pregnant Women Oral Health Related Quality of Life: a Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorNourhan M.AlyRan2019 to 2019Enrolled162ConditionsQuality of Life, Dental CariesArmsPapacarie, Atraumatic Restorative Treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Interventions for treating cavitated or dentine carious lesions.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Chemomechanical Caries Removal with Enzymatic Technology: A ComparativeInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lara Jansiski MottaMestrado em Ciências da Reabilitação, Universidade Nove de Julho, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Sandra Kalil BussadoriMestrado em Ciências da Reabilitação, Universidade Nove de Julho, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Ana Paula CampanelliBauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
André Luis da SilvaBauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Thays Almeida AlfayaDental Clinic Post-Graduate Program, Odontotécnica, Federal Fluminense University, São Gonçalo, RJ, Brazil.
Camila Haddad Leal de GodoyMestrado em Ciências da Reabilitação, Universidade Nove de Julho, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Maria Fidela de Lima NavarroBauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Nove de Julho · BRUniversidade Federal Fluminense · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of the present study was to analyze the efficacy of Papacarie(®) gel compared with the traditional method (low-speed bur) in reducing the counts of total bacteria, Lactobacillus, total Streptococcus and Streptococcus mutans group.

methodsA randomized, controlled clinical trial with a split-mouth design was performed. The sample comprised 40 deciduous teeth in 20 children (10 males and 10 females) aged four to seven years. The teeth were randomly allocated to two groups: G1, or chemomechanical caries removal with Papacarie Duo(®), and G2, or the removal of carious dentin tissue with a low-speed bur. Infected dentin was collected prior to the procedure, and the remaining dentin was collected immediately following the removal of the carious tissue. Initial and final counts of bacterial colonies were performed to determine whether there was a reduction in the number of colony-forming units (CFUs) of each microorganism studied. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01811420.

resultsReductions were found in the numbers of total bacteria, total Streptococcus and Streptococcus mutans group following either of the caries removal methods (p<0.05). A reduction was also noted in the number of Lactobacillus CFUs; however, this difference did not achieve statistical significance (p>0.05).

conclusionPapacarie(®) is an excellent option for the minimally invasive removal of carious tissue, achieving significant reductions in total bacteria, total Streptococcus and S. mutans with the same effectiveness as the traditional caries removal method.

Indexed as

ChildChild, PreschoolDental CariesDentinFemaleHumansLactobacillusMalePapainStreptococcusStreptococcus mutansTooth, DeciduousPapacariePapain

Identifiers

PMID24838896
PMCPMC4012231
OpenAlexW2079747110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.