SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2014
Imipramine for neuropathic pain in adults.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2024Pooled it
- Efficacy of antidepressants in the treatment of chronic nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Pain management · 2024Pooled it
- Interventions for treating pain and disability in adults with complex regional pain syndrome- an overview of systematic reviews.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Drug-related Halitosis: A Systematic Review.Oral health & preventive dentistry · 2020Pooled it
- Venlafaxine for neuropathic pain in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Nortriptyline for neuropathic pain in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Desipramine for neuropathic pain in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- The use of a battery of pain models to detect analgesic properties of compounds: a two-part four-way crossover study.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2017Trial
- Opiorphin and neuropathic pain: a promising treatment approach?Inflammopharmacology · 2025Review
- Off-label use of medicines in South Africa: a review.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2024Review
- Potentiation of Imipramine-Induced Anti-hyperalgesic and Anti-Nociceptive Effects by Citicoline in the Sciatic Nerve Ligated Mice.Archives of Iranian medicine · 2024Article
- Update on Treating Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Review of Current US Guidelines with a Focus on the Most Recently Approved Management Options.Journal of pain research · 2024Review
- Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Review
- Trends in Prescriptions for Non-opioid Pain Medications Among U.S. Adults With Moderate or Severe Pain, 2014-2018.The journal of pain · 2022Article
- Pharmacotherapy of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: A Clinical Update.Sisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni · 2022Review
- Current Challenges in the Management of Chronic Pelvic Pain in Women: From Bench to Bedside.International journal of women's health · 2022Review
- Diabetes: how to manage diabetic peripheral neuropathy.Drugs in context · 2022Review
- Emerging Roles for Ion Channels in Ovarian Cancer: Pathomechanisms and Pharmacological Treatment.Cancers · 2021Review
- Expert review and recommendations for the management of acute, chronic, and neuropathic pain in Qatar.Qatar medical journal · 2021Article
- Challenges of neuropathic pain: focus on diabetic neuropathy.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAntidepressants are widely used to treat chronic neuropathic pain (pain due to nerve damage), usually in doses below those at which they exert antidepressant effects. An earlier review that included all antidepressants for neuropathic pain is being replaced by new reviews of individual drugs examining individual neuropathic pain conditions.Imipramine is a tricyclic antidepressant that is occasionally used to treat neuropathic pain.
objectivesTo assess the analgesic efficacy of imipramine for chronic neuropathic pain in adults, and to assess the associated adverse events. SEARCH
methodsWe searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE on 18 November 2013, as well as the reference lists of retrieved papers and other reviews. We also used our own handsearched database for older studies, and two clinical trials databases. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised, double-blind studies of at least two weeks' duration comparing imipramine with placebo or another active treatment in chronic neuropathic pain. Participants were adults aged 18 and over. We included only articles with full journal publication and extended trial abstracts and summaries. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently extracted efficacy and adverse event data, and examined issues of study quality. We performed analysis using three tiers of evidence. First tier evidence was derived from data meeting current best standards and subject to minimal risk of bias (outcome equivalent to substantial pain intensity reduction, intention-to-treat analysis without imputation for dropouts; at least 200 participants in the comparison, 8 to 12 weeks duration, parallel design); second tier from data that failed to meet one or more of these criteria and were considered at some risk of bias but with adequate numbers in the comparison; and third tier from data involving small numbers of participants which was considered very likely to be biased or used outcomes of limited clinical utility, or both. MAIN
resultsFive studies treated 168 participants with painful diabetic neuropathy or polyneuropathy. The mean age in individual studies was between 47 and 56 years. Four studies used a cross-over, and one a parallel group design; 126 participants were randomised to receive imipramine 25 mg to 350 mg daily (most took 100 mg to 150 mg daily). Comparators were placebo (an active placebo in one study), paroxetine, mianserin, venlafaxine, and amitriptyline, and treatment was given for 2 to 12 weeks. All studies had one or more sources of potential major bias.No study provided first or second tier evidence for any outcome. No data were available on the proportion of people with at least 50% or 30% reduction in pain or equivalent, and data were available from only one study for our other primary outcome of Patient Global Impression of Change, reported as patient evaluation of pain relief of complete or good. No pooling of data was possible, but third tier evidence in individual studies indicated some improvement in pain relief with imipramine compared with placebo, although this is was very low quality evidence, derived mainly from group mean data and completer analyses, in small, short duration studies where major bias is possible.Four studies reported some information about adverse events, but reporting was inconsistent and fragmented, and the quality of evidence was very low. Participants taking imipramine generally experienced more adverse events, notably dry mouth, and a higher rate of withdrawal due to adverse events, than did participants taking placebo. AUTHORS'
conclusionsThis review found little evidence to support the use of imipramine to treat neuropathic pain. There was very low quality evidence of benefit but this came from studies that were methodologically flawed and potentially subject to major bias. Effective medicines with much greater supportive evidence are available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.