Trial reportEuropean journal of pediatrics2014
Clinical outcome of parapneumonic empyema in children treated according to a standardized medical treatment.
Trial report in European journal of pediatrics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Complicated pneumococcal pneumonia in the era of higher-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccines: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis, 2001-2022.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025Pooled it
- Clinical profile and outcome of complicated community-acquired pneumonia in children in the post-pneumococcal vaccination era.World journal of clinical cases · 2025Article
- Population-Based Cohort of Children With Parapneumonic Effusion and Empyema Managed With Low Rates of Pleural Drainage.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2021Article
- Factors Associated With the Presence of Tuberculous Empyema in Children With Pleural Tuberculosis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
unlabelledTreatment of parapneumonic empyema (PE) consists of intravenous antibiotics and, in case of large effusions and persisting fever, pleural chest drain (±intrapleural fibrinolytics) or video-assisted surgical intervention. We standardized the treatment for PE in our tertiary care center choosing a first-step nonsurgical approach. The aim was to evaluate the need for surgery and to collect data on disease course, outcome, and microbiology. For all children treated for PE between 2006 and 2013, data were prospectively collected concerning treatment, length of stay, duration of fever, complications, and causative agent. Of 132 children treated for PE, 20 % needed surgical intervention. Analyzed per year, the need for surgery decreased from almost 40 % in 2007 to 0 % in 2010 again increasing to 40 % although this did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.115). Median duration of "in-hospital fever" was 5 days (IQR, 3-8). The duration of fever correlated with pleural LDH (r = 0.324; p = 0.002) and pleural glucose (r = -0.248; p = 0.021) and was inversely correlated with pleural pH (r = -0.249; p = 0.046). Based on pleural PCR data, 85 % of PE were caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae (40 % serotype 1).
conclusionAfter introduction of a standardized primary medical approach (chest drain ± fibrinolysis) for PE in our institution, the need for surgical rescue interventions overall remained at 20 %, which is higher than in some other reports. Difference in microbiology or disease severity could not be proven.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.