Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24837591›Full record

SynthesismAbs

A model-based meta-analysis of monoclonal antibody pharmacokinetics to guide optimal first-in-human study design.

Jasmine P Davda, Michael G Dodds, Megan A Gibbs, Wendy Wisdom, John Gibbs

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in mAbs. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. A new pharmacokinetic model forScientific reports · 2018
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Advancing Subcutaneous Dosing Regimens for Biotherapeutics: Clinical Strategies for Expedited Market Access.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jasmine P Davda1Amgen Inc. Pharmacokinetics and Drug Metabolism; Seattle, WA, South San Francisco, CA, and Thousand Oaks, CA USA.
Michael G Dodds1Amgen Inc. Pharmacokinetics and Drug Metabolism; Seattle, WA, South San Francisco, CA, and Thousand Oaks, CA USA.
Megan A Gibbs1Amgen Inc. Pharmacokinetics and Drug Metabolism; Seattle, WA, South San Francisco, CA, and Thousand Oaks, CA USA.
Wendy Wisdom1Amgen Inc. Pharmacokinetics and Drug Metabolism; Seattle, WA, South San Francisco, CA, and Thousand Oaks, CA USA.
John Gibbs1Amgen Inc. Pharmacokinetics and Drug Metabolism; Seattle, WA, South San Francisco, CA, and Thousand Oaks, CA USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objectives of this retrospective analysis were (1) to characterize the population pharmacokinetics (popPK) of four different monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in a combined analysis of individual data collected during first-in-human (FIH) studies and (2) to provide a scientific rationale for prospective design of FIH studies with mAbs. The data set was composed of 171 subjects contributing a total of 2716 mAb serum concentrations, following intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) doses. mAb PK was described by an open 2-compartment model with first-order elimination from the central compartment and a depot compartment with first-order absorption. Parameter values obtained from the popPK model were further used to generate optimal sampling times for a single dose study. A robust fit to the combined data from four mAbs was obtained using the 2-compartment model. Population parameter estimates for systemic clearance and central volume of distribution were 0.20 L/day and 3.6 L with intersubject variability of 31% and 34%, respectively. The random residual error was 14%. Differences (> 2-fold) in PK parameters were not apparent across mAbs. Rich designs (22 samples/subject), minimal designs for popPK (5 samples/subject), and optimal designs for non-compartmental analysis (NCA) and popPK (10 samples/subject) were examined by stochastic simulation and estimation. Single-dose PK studies for linear mAbs executed using the optimal designs are expected to yield high-quality model estimates, and accurate capture of NCA estimations. This model-based meta-analysis has determined typical popPK values for four mAbs with linear elimination and enabled prospective optimization of FIH study designs, potentially improving the efficiency of FIH studies for this class of therapeutics.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAdministration, IntravenousAntibodies, MonoclonalHumansInjections, SubcutaneousStochastic ProcessesAntibodies, Monoclonaldrug developmentfirst in humanmeta-analysismonoclonal antibodyoptimal designpopulation pharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID24837591
PMCPMC4171012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.