Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24837481›Full record

Trial reportClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2014

Enhanced personal contact with HIV patients improves retention in primary care: a randomized trial in 6 US HIV clinics.

Lytt I Gardner, Thomas P Giordano, Gary Marks, Tracey E Wilson, Jason A Craw, Mari-Lynn Drainoni, Jeanne C Keruly, Allan E Rodriguez, Faye Malitz, Richard D Moore and 9 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02693145 (Cooperative Re-Engagement Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 93 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
93citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02693145 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Cooperative Re-Engagement Controlled Trial (CoRECT)

TypeinterventionalSponsorCenters for Disease Control and PreventionRan2016 to 2020Enrolled1,893ConditionsHuman Immunodeficiency VirusArmsAnti-Retroviral Treatment and Access to Services (ARTAS)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

93 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Guideline
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Lytt I GardnerDivision of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Thomas P GiordanoDepartment of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, and the Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael. E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas.
Gary MarksDivision of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Tracey E WilsonDepartment of Community Health Sciences, State University of New York (SUNY) Downstate Medical Center School of Public Health, Brooklyn.
Jason A CrawDivision of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Mari-Lynn DrainoniDepartment of Health Policy & Management, Boston University School of Public Health Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial VA Hospital Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jeanne C KerulyDepartment of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Allan E RodriguezDivision of Infectious Diseases, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Florida.
Faye MalitzHIV/AIDS Bureau, Health Resources and Services Administration, Rockville, Maryland.
Richard D MooreDepartment of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Lucy A Bradley-SpringerSchool of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO.
Susan HolmanColleges of Medicine and Nursing, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York.
Charles E RoseDivision of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Sonali GirdeDivision of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia ICF International, Inc, Atlanta, Georgia.
Meg SullivanDepartment of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Lisa R MetschDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Miami, Florida.
Michael Saag1917 HIV/AIDS Clinic and Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham.
Michael J Mugavero1917 HIV/AIDS Clinic and Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham.
Retention in Care Study Group

Funding

University of Miami Developmental Center for AIDS Research (D-CFAR)P30AI073961 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI ALLAN E RODRIGUEZ · 2007 to 2026
$33.8M
Johns Hopkins HIV Clinical CohortU01DA036935 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MOORE, RICHARD DOUGLAS · 2014 to 2024
$14.9M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI073961NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA036935
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of the study was to determine whether enhanced personal contact with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients across time improves retention in care compared with existing standard of care (SOC) practices, and whether brief skills training improves retention beyond enhanced contact.

methodsThe study, conducted at 6 HIV clinics in the United States, included 1838 patients with a recent history of inconsistent clinic attendance, and new patients. Each clinic randomized participants to 1 of 3 arms and continued to provide SOC practices to all enrollees: enhanced contact with interventionist (EC) (brief face-to-face meeting upon returning for care visit, interim visit call, appointment reminder calls, missed visit call); EC + skills (organization, problem solving, and communication skills); or SOC only. The intervention was delivered by project staff for 12 months following randomization. The outcomes during that 12-month period were (1) percentage of participants attending at least 1 primary care visit in 3 consecutive 4-month intervals (visit constancy), and (2) proportion of kept/scheduled primary care visits (visit adherence).

resultsLog-binomial risk ratios comparing intervention arms against the SOC arm demonstrated better outcomes in both the EC and EC + skills arms (visit constancy: risk ratio [RR], 1.22 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.09-1.36] and 1.22 [95% CI, 1.09-1.36], respectively; visit adherence: RR, 1.08 [95% CI, 1.05-1.11] and 1.06 [95% CI, 1.02-1.09], respectively; all Ps < .01). Intervention effects were observed in numerous patient subgroups, although they were lower in patients reporting unmet needs or illicit drug use.

conclusionsEnhanced contact with patients improved retention in HIV primary care compared with existing SOC practices. A brief patient skill-building component did not improve retention further. Additional intervention elements may be needed for patients reporting illicit drug use or who have unmet needs. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: CDCHRSA9272007.

Indexed as

Ambulatory Care FacilitiesHIV InfectionsPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient Education as TopicProfessional-Patient RelationsAdolescentAdultAppointments and SchedulesFemaleHealth Services Needs and DemandHumansMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CarePrimary Health CareStandard of Carebehavioral intervention trialHIV infectionHIV specialty clinicsrandomized controlled trialretention in care

Identifiers

PMID24837481
PMCPMC4366591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.