Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24837288›Full record

ArticleJournal of bacteriology2014

Physiological and proteomic analysis of Escherichia coli iron-limited chemostat growth.

James Patrick Folsom, Albert E Parker, Ross P Carlson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bacteriology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Bacterial iron acquisition byProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Integrative Thermodynamic Strategies in Microbial Metabolism.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Conversion ofMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

James Patrick FolsomDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, USA Center for Biofilm Engineering, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, USA.
Albert E ParkerCenter for Biofilm Engineering, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, USA Department of Mathematical Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, USA.
Ross P CarlsonDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, USA Center for Biofilm Engineering, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, USA rossc@erc.montana.edu.

Funding

SYSTEMS BIOLOGY OF HOST-PATHOGEN INTERACTIONSP20RR024237 · NCRR · MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY - BOZEMAN · PI DRATZ, EDWARD A · 2008 to 2011
$8.1M
NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR024237NCRR NIH HHS P20RR024237
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Iron bioavailability is a major limiter of bacterial growth in mammalian host tissue and thus represents an important area of study. Escherichia coli K-12 metabolism was studied at four levels of iron limitation in chemostats using physiological and proteomic analyses. The data documented an E. coli acclimation gradient where progressively more severe iron scarcity resulted in a larger percentage of substrate carbon being directed into an overflow metabolism accompanied by a decrease in biomass yield on glucose. Acetate was the primary secreted organic by-product for moderate levels of iron limitation, but as stress increased, the metabolism shifted to secrete primarily lactate (∼70% of catabolized glucose carbon). Proteomic analysis reinforced the physiological data and quantified relative increases in glycolysis enzyme abundance and decreases in tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle enzyme abundance with increasing iron limitation stress. The combined data indicated that E. coli responds to limiting iron by investing the scarce resource in essential enzymes, at the cost of catabolic efficiency (i.e., downregulating high-ATP-yielding pathways containing enzymes with large iron requirements, like the TCA cycle). Acclimation to iron-limited growth was contrasted experimentally with acclimation to glucose-limited growth to identify both general and nutrient-specific acclimation strategies. While the iron-limited cultures maximized biomass yields on iron and increased expression of iron acquisition strategies, the glucose-limited cultures maximized biomass yields on glucose and increased expression of carbon acquisition strategies. This study quantified ecologically competitive acclimations to nutrient limitations, yielding knowledge essential for understanding medically relevant bacterial responses to host and to developing intervention strategies.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalGene Expression Regulation, BacterialProteomicsBacterial ProteinsBiomassCarbonCitric Acid CycleCulture MediaElectrophoresis, Gel, Two-DimensionalEnergy MetabolismEscherichia coli K12GlucoseGlycolysisIronMass SpectrometryBacterial ProteinsCarbonCulture MediaGlucoseIron

Identifiers

PMID24837288
PMCPMC4135680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.