Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24836713›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2014

BEST: barcode enabled sequencing of tetrads.

Adrian C Scott, Catherine L Ludlow, Gareth A Cromie, Aimée M Dudley

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Adrian C ScottPacific Northwest Diabetes Research Institute.
Catherine L LudlowPacific Northwest Diabetes Research Institute.
Gareth A CromiePacific Northwest Diabetes Research Institute.
Aimée M DudleyPacific Northwest Diabetes Research Institute; aimee.dudley@gmail.com.

Funding

Temporal and spatial effects on expression and functionK22HG002908 · NHGRI · INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY · PI DUDLEY, AIMEE M · 2003 to 2009
$1.1M
NHGRI NIH HHS K22 HG002908
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tetrad analysis is a valuable tool for yeast genetics, but the laborious manual nature of the process has hindered its application on large scales. Barcode Enabled Sequencing of Tetrads (BEST)1 replaces the manual processes of isolating, disrupting and spacing tetrads. BEST isolates tetrads by virtue of a sporulation-specific GFP fusion protein that permits fluorescence-activated cell sorting of tetrads directly onto agar plates, where the ascus is enzymatically digested and the spores are disrupted and randomly arrayed by glass bead plating. The haploid colonies are then assigned sister spore relationships, i.e. information about which spores originated from the same tetrad, using molecular barcodes read during genotyping. By removing the bottleneck of manual dissection, hundreds or even thousands of tetrads can be isolated in minutes. Here we present a detailed description of the experimental procedures required to perform BEST in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, starting with a heterozygous diploid strain through the isolation of colonies derived from the haploid meiotic progeny.

Indexed as

DiploidyDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicDNA, FungalFlow CytometryHaploidyHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMeiosisSaccharomyces cerevisiaeDNA, Fungal

Identifiers

PMID24836713
PMCPMC4172027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.