Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24836086›Full record

ArticleJournal of affective disorders2014

Are multiple physical symptoms a poor prognostic factor or just a marker of depression severity? Secondary analysis of the GenPod trial.

Amy Green, Andrew Crawford, Katherine S Button, Nicola Wiles, Tim J Peters, David Nutt, Glyn Lewis

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of affective disorders, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Precision Medicine in Antidepressants Treatment.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Amy GreenCentre for Academic Mental Health, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, United Kingdom.
Andrew CrawfordCentre for Academic Mental Health, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, United Kingdom.
Katherine S ButtonCentre for Academic Mental Health, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, United Kingdom.
Nicola WilesCentre for Academic Mental Health, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, United Kingdom.
Tim J PetersSchool of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, United Kingdom.
David NuttFaculty of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.
Glyn LewisDivision of Psychaitry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College, London, United Kingdom.
University of Bristol · GBImperial College London · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G020024Medical Research Council G0200243
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUsing data from the GenPod trial this study investigates: (i) if depressed individuals with multiple physical symptoms have a poorer response to antidepressants before and after adjustment for baseline Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II); and (ii) if reboxetine is more effective than citalopram in depression with multiple physical symptoms.

methodsLinear regression models were used to estimate differences in mean BDI-II score at 6 and 12 weeks.

resultsBefore adjusting for baseline BDI-II, the difference in mean BDI-II score between no and multiple physical symptoms was 4.5 (95% CI 1.87, 7.14) at 6 weeks, 4.51 (95% CI 1.60, 7.42) at 12 weeks. After adjustment for baseline BDI-II, there was no evidence of a difference in outcome according to physical symptoms with a difference in mean BDI-II of 2.17 (95% CI -0.39, 4.73) at 6 weeks and 2.43 (95% CI -0.46, 5.32) at 12 weeks. There was no evidence that reboxetine was more effective than citalopram in those with multiple physical symptoms at 6 (P=0.18) or 12 weeks (P=0.24). LIMITATIONS: Differential non-adherence between treatment arms has the potential to bias estimates of treatment efficacy.

conclusionMultiple physical symptoms predict response to antidepressants, but not after adjustment for baseline depression severity. Physical symptoms could be a marker of severe depression rather than an independent prognostic factor and depression should be considered in patients with multiple physical symptoms. Treatment with reboxetine conferred no advantage over citalopram in those with physical symptoms, and it is less well tolerated.

Indexed as

AdultAntidepressive AgentsCitalopramDepressionFemaleHumansLinear ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMorpholinesPrognosisPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReboxetineTreatment OutcomeAntidepressive AgentsCitalopramMorpholinesReboxetineAntidepressantsCitalopramDepressionPhysical symptomsReboxetine

Identifiers

PMID24836086
PMCPMC4315809
OpenAlexW2115849680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.