ArticlePloS one2014
Improving prediction of surgical site infection risk with multilevel modeling.
Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Prognostic Model of Surgical Site Infection Using Daily Clinical Wound Assessment.Journal of the American College of Surgeons · 2016Trial
- Estimating the impact of patient-level risk factors and time-varying hospital unit on healthcare-associatedInfection control and hospital epidemiology · 2026Article
- Comment on 'A Prospective Observational Study to Assess the Surgical Site Infections Following Abdominal Surgeries in a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital'.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Effect of preoperative hospital stay on surgical site infection in Chinese cranial neurosurgery.BMC neurology · 2023Observational
- Risk Factors Associated with Surgical Site Infections: A Retrospective Report from a Developing Country.Cureus · 2019Article
- Application of antimicrobial drugs in perioperative surgical incision.Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials · 2018Review
- Patient autonomy and disclosure of material information about hospital-acquired infections.Infection and drug resistance · 2018Review
- Incidence and risk factors for surgical site infection in general surgeries.Revista latino-americana de enfermagem · 2017Article
- Risk factors for surgical site infection after posterior fixation surgery and intraoperative radiotherapy for spinal metastases.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2016Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSurgical site infection (SSI) surveillance is a key factor in the elaboration of strategies to reduce SSI occurrence and in providing surgeons with appropriate data feedback (risk indicators, clinical prediction rule).
aimTo improve the predictive performance of an individual-based SSI risk model by considering a multilevel hierarchical structure. PATIENTS AND
methodsData were collected anonymously by the French SSI active surveillance system in 2011. An SSI diagnosis was made by the surgical teams and infection control practitioners following standardized criteria. A random 20% sample comprising 151 hospitals, 502 wards and 62280 patients was used. Three-level (patient, ward, hospital) hierarchical logistic regression models were initially performed. Parameters were estimated using the simulation-based Markov Chain Monte Carlo procedure.
resultsA total of 623 SSI were diagnosed (1%). The hospital level was discarded from the analysis as it did not contribute to variability of SSI occurrence (p = 0.32). Established individual risk factors (patient history, surgical procedure and hospitalization characteristics) were identified. A significant heterogeneity in SSI occurrence between wards was found (median odds ratio [MOR] 3.59, 95% credibility interval [CI] 3.03 to 4.33) after adjusting for patient-level variables. The effects of the follow-up duration varied between wards (p<10-9), with an increased heterogeneity when follow-up was <15 days (MOR 6.92, 95% CI 5.31 to 9.07]). The final two-level model significantly improved the discriminative accuracy compared to the single level reference model (p<10-9), with an area under the ROC curve of 0.84.
conclusionThis study sheds new light on the respective contribution of patient-, ward- and hospital-levels to SSI occurrence and demonstrates the significant impact of the ward level over and above risk factors present at patient level (i.e., independently from patient case-mix).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.