Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24834939›Full record

Trial reportActa oto-laryngologica2014

Hearing preservation and clinical outcome of 32 consecutive electric acoustic stimulation (EAS) surgeries.

Shin-Ichi Usami, Hideaki Moteki, Keita Tsukada, Maiko Miyagawa, Shin-Ya Nishio, Yutaka Takumi, Satoshi Iwasaki, Kozo Kumakawa, Yasushi Naito, Haruo Takahashi and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Acta oto-laryngologica, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Multicenter US Clinical Trial With an Electric-Acoustic Stimulation (EAS) System in Adults: Final Outcomes.Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology · 2018
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Long-term residual hearing in cochlear implanted adult patients who were candidates for electro-acoustic stimulation.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2020
    Article
  12. Hearing Preservation With the Use of Flex20 and Flex24 Electrodes in Patients With Partial Deafness.Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Effects of Removing Low-Frequency Electric Information on Speech Perception With Bimodal Hearing.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2016
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Shin-Ichi UsamiDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and.
Hideaki Moteki
Keita Tsukada
Maiko Miyagawa
Shin-Ya Nishio
Yutaka Takumi
Satoshi Iwasaki
Kozo Kumakawa
Yasushi Naito
Haruo Takahashi
Yukihiko Kanda
Tetsuya Tono
Scientific Research Clinical Institute. L.I. Sverzhevsky · RUKobe City Medical Center General Hospital · JPNagasaki University · JPShinshu University Hospital · JPToranomon Hospital · JPUniversity of Miyazaki · JPUniversity of Nagasaki · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

conclusionsOur results indicated that electric acoustic stimulation (EAS) is beneficial for Japanese-speaking patients, including those with less residual hearing at lower frequencies. Comparable outcomes for the patients with less residual hearing indicated that current audiological criteria for EAS could be expanded. Successful hearing preservation results, together with the progressive nature of loss of residual hearing in these patients, mean that minimally invasive full insertion of medium/long electrodes in cochlear implantation (CI) surgery is a desirable solution. The minimally invasive concepts that have been obtained through EAS surgery are, in fact, crucial for all CI patients.

objectivesThis study was conducted to evaluate hearing preservation results and speech discrimination outcomes of hearing preservation surgeries using medium/long electrodes.

methodsA total of 32 consecutive minimally invasive hearing preservation CIs (using a round window approach with deep insertion of a flexible electrode) were performed in 30 Japanese patients (two were bilateral cases), including patients with less residual hearing. Hearing preservation rates as well as speech discrimination/perception scores were investigated on a multicenter basis.

resultsPostoperative evaluation after full insertion of the flexible electrodes (24 mm, 31.5 mm) showed that residual hearing was well preserved in all 32 ears. In all patients, speech discrimination and perception scores were improved postoperatively.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsAdultAgedAuditory ThresholdFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHearing Loss, High-FrequencyHearing Loss, SensorineuralHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedRound Window, EarSpeech PerceptionTreatment OutcomeDeep insertionhigh-frequency hearing lossresidual hearing

Identifiers

PMID24834939
PMCPMC4086239
OpenAlexW1988138733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.