ArticleCardiovascular diagnosis and therapy2014
Magnetic resonance imaging as a tool to assess reliability in simulating hemodynamics in cerebral aneurysms with a dedicated computational fluid dynamics prototype: preliminary results.
Article in Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fast simulation of hemodynamics in intracranial aneurysms for clinical use.Acta neurochirurgica · 2025Article
- Depiction of Cerebral Aneurysm Wall by Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) and Preoperative Illustration.Asian journal of neurosurgery · 2022Article
- Reconstructing patient-specific cerebral aneurysm vasculature for in vitro investigations and treatment efficacy assessments.Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia · 2019Article
- Patient-Specific Computational Fluid Dynamics in Ruptured Posterior Communicating Aneurysms Using Measured Non-Newtonian Viscosity : A Preliminary Study.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAs an example of enhancing information in clinical image data by computational methods, simulating hemodynamics in cerebral aneurysms by means of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is currently a topic of active research. Challenges consist in translating this engineering technology into clinical research, validating the simulations and addressing a potential clinical value of the results. In this preliminary study, we demonstrate the use of phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging (pcMRI) for assessing the reliability of CFD results. MATERIALS AND
methodsFor six cerebral aneurysms where intra-aneurysmal velocity information was available by 2D pcMRI, steady CFD simulations with constant inflow were performed using a dedicated CFD prototype system. Major features of the velocity patterns derived from pcMRI were compared to those obtained with the CFD.
resultsGood qualitative agreement between measured (2D pcMRI) and simulated (CFD) features of the intra-aneurysmal velocity patterns were obtained. These findings are discussed in the broader framework of the expectations towards CFD simulations in a clinical research setting.
conclusionsComputational simulations reproduce major features of measured velocity patterns in cerebral aneurysms. Looking forward, these simulations need to be refined towards specific applications in clinical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.