Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24833902›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychiatric disease and treatment2014

Comprehensive cognitive and cerebral hemodynamic evaluation after cranioplasty.

Fernanda Coelho, Arthur Maynart Oliveira, Wellingson Silva Paiva, Fabio Rios Freire, Vanessa Tome Calado, Robson Luis Amorim, Iuri Santana Neville, Almir Ferreira de Andrade, Edson Bor-Seng-Shu, Renato Anghinah and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04855175 (Evaluation of Cranioplasty Using Native Bone Autograft Versus Synthetic Bone Allograft), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04855175 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of Cranioplasty Using Native Bone Autograft Versus Synthetic Bone Allograft

TypeinterventionalSponsorLifeBridge HealthRan2021 to 2022Enrolled1ConditionsSurgical Procedure, UnspecifiedArmsSynthetic Bone Allograft (ClearFit), Autograft
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Biomaterial and implant induced ossification: in vitro and in vivo findings.Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fernanda CoelhoNeurorehabilitation Group, Division of Neurology, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
Arthur Maynart OliveiraDivision of Neurosurgery, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
Wellingson Silva PaivaDivision of Neurosurgery, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
Fabio Rios FreireNeurorehabilitation Group, Division of Neurology, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
Vanessa Tome CaladoNeurorehabilitation Group, Division of Neurology, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
Robson Luis AmorimDivision of Neurosurgery, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
Iuri Santana NevilleDivision of Neurosurgery, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
Almir Ferreira de AndradeDivision of Neurosurgery, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
Edson Bor-Seng-ShuNeurosonology and Cerebral Hemodynamics Group, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
Renato AnghinahNeurorehabilitation Group, Division of Neurology, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
Manoel Jacobsen TeixeiraDivision of Neurosurgery, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decompressive craniectomy is an established procedure to lower intracranial pressure and can save patients' lives. However, this procedure is associated with delayed cognitive decline and cerebral hemodynamics complications. Studies show the benefits of cranioplasty beyond cosmetic aspects, including brain protection, and functional and cerebrovascular aspects, but a detailed description of the concrete changes following this procedure are lacking. In this paper, the authors report a patient with trephine syndrome who underwent cranioplasty; comprehensive cognitive and cerebral hemodynamic evaluations were performed prior to and following the cranioplasty. The discussion was based on a critical literature review.

Indexed as

cognitioncranioplastydecompressive craniotomyneuropsychological testperfusion CTtraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID24833902
PMCPMC4014378
OpenAlexW1998313391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.