Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24833891›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2014

Recurrent nontuberculous mycobacterial endophthalmitis: a diagnostic conundrum.

Nandini Venkateswaran, Gabrielle Yeaney, Mina Chung, Holly B Hindman

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nandini VenkateswaranUniversity of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Gabrielle YeaneyDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.
Mina ChungFlaum Eye Institute, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA ; Center for Visual Science, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.
Holly B HindmanFlaum Eye Institute, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA ; Center for Visual Science, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.
University of Rochester · US

Funding

Corneal Wound Healing, Ocular Optics, and Endothelial KeratoplastyK23EY019353 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI HINDMAN, HOLLY BUTLER · 2009 to 2013
$1.1M
NEI NIH HHS K23 EY019353
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo report a case of recurrent nontuberculous mycobacterial endophthalmitis in the context of neurotrophic keratopathy secondary to herpes zoster ophthalmicus that had an atypical presentation and complex course, and highlights the challenges of causative organism identification and therapeutic interventions in this condition.

methodsA retrospective chart review was conducted to determine the visual outcomes of the patient.

resultsA 68-year-old pseudophakic male with long-standing neurotrophic keratopathy and perforated descemetocele managed with cyanoacrylate glue and a contact bandage lens in the left eye, began experiencing recurrent episodes of endophthalmitis after undergoing a penetrating keratoplasty. Several therapeutic procedures including an anterior chamber washout, two pars plana vitrectomies, explantation of the posterior chamber intraocular lens and capsular bag, and multiple intravitreal antimicrobial injections, were performed to which he has ultimately responded favorably, with no signs of infection to date and stable visual acuity. The causative organism of his recurrent infections was initially identified as Mycobacterium abscessus through biochemical testing and 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid gene sequencing; however, repeat polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and sequencing of the 65 kDa heat shock protein (hsp65) gene for experimental purposes confirmed the accurate identification of the organism to be Mycobacterium chelonae. Given the greater reliability of PCR and sequencing of the hsp65 gene over traditional biochemical tests and culture techniques, M. chelonae was likely the infectious agent all along, and the organism was originally misidentified on the basis of less accurate tests.

conclusionRecurrent atypical mycobacterial endophthalmitis requires expedient identification and management to prevent poor visual outcomes. Standard biochemical testing can identify the causative organism but is limited by the inability to distinguish between nontuberculous species reliably. We recommend the use of PCR in conjunction with sequencing of the hsp65 gene for reliable differentiation of M. chelonae and M. abscessus in atypical mycobacterial ocular infections. Minimum inhibitory concentration antibiotic susceptibility tests on cultured strains are the best guide to antibiotic selection, given the rapidly rising resistance to antimicrobials in atypical mycobacterial species.

Indexed as

atypical mycobacteriaherpes zoster ophthalmicushsp65Mycobacterium chelonaeneurotrophic keratopathyvisual outcome

Identifiers

PMID24833891
PMCPMC4014381
OpenAlexW2013499779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.